-
Posts
1085 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Media Demo
Store
Collections
Videos
Posts posted by tboorn
-
-
more cone area = more ear-o-meter pressure
-
just 1 D4 X12? you couldnt run that at a 1 ohm load nominal, only 2 ohm or 8 ohm, if you got two of them then you could run 1 ohm nominal. Or just get a single D2
-
-
so far the biggest upgrade from other lithium batteries that i see with the xspower ones is that these only have 1 set of terminals, vs the juicebox where each battery has 2 sets of terminals. Which for people like me who are trying to run SB1 or any other class with battery limitations sounds awesome since 2 terminal sets means 2 batteries technically
-
78255 San Antonio, TX. Term Lab
-
sick tuned in for this deadly monster
-
why is the coolant off?
i thought the same thing but i dont know enough about them so.. convinced myself it must be some new super bad ass CNC haha
-
yeah i saw that guess i half forgot. Maybe because I'm not 100% familiar with that machine and its workings as well, just saw another number even though it was "more proof", in my mind it just didn't help register as to what the distortion actually is.
-
You know what the worst part is? If you took that head unit back to the place you bought it, explained the situation, they wouldn't even consider replacing it.
They'd say that's not possible for you to detect that, or they stick it on their O-scope and see nothing (if they even have one). Just try to convince them that the DD-1 was made by some of the top guys in the industry, but they won't give a shit.
And then you'd be out $1300 on that brand new head unit.
which is almost half the point exactly, i understand that distortion isn't clipping by definition and only sometimes do they relate, but if the DD-1 is showing that either a head unit or amp is distorting signal in some way/some times, what way is there to prove it, if not even an oscilloscope will show the amount that is happening to the naked eye? I say this purely because the type of person i am i don't like to take things at face value without proof, not saying that the proof isn't there, DO NOT TAKE THIS AS A BASH REPLY, i fully respect the product, its just after seeing this video it only further proves that we may in fact be mislead even with the best of intentions, like watching for a "clean" single on an oscilloscope, because if all we have to trust is this one device, that only has 1 red light to either prove or disprove distortion, what proof does each individual user have to further prove and back up the test. Because not everybody is always a good person, someone in the position of the DD-1 maker, could unknowingly be doing the same thing and if only that one test will prove your point, it may be hard to get the backing needed, or prove its actually true. Im just trying to expand my knowledge once again I'm not hating on the product.
-
yeah i cant wait until someone puts a build log of the install, and what it takes to keep this monster spinnin haha.
- 1
-
anything on this??
-
That much neo looks insane!! in only the best ways. When i got my N3's and after doing all the research i could, people always "claimed" there was too much motor force to play well on music. And they only have 3 neo pucks. But damn that thing is PURE neo, i cant even imagine how much motor force that thing has.
Any more news/testing on these yet?
Random Picture Post V2
in Off Topic - Random, Misc posts - the forum "Junk Drawer"
Posted