eCrack.net

I would be surprised if Tony and I had a difference of opinion tbh. I might word something that he takes issue with, but I think at the core as long as I stick to factual information he won't have a very big issue with it.

Thank you gentlemen. I plan on making an instructional series soon. Please subscribe to my channel if you haven't. I compete in MECA, where efficiency is the most important factor and knowing the most allows you to win. I have a degree in electronics and I really enjoy explaining the proper ways to do things.

Thanks for the comments Mr. Meade.

Thanks gentlemen. I'm glad you liked it. The DD-1 is a good piece of equipment and for the price would be very difficult to beat. The industry needed a tool like it badly. On the negative side, I believe it was a mistake for them to include the -15db and -10 db tones or whatever they were. -5 is about as low as you would want to set. We're not worried about losing some "potential" on music. We're worried about setting our maximum ceiling on our equipment so that it never exceeds its limits. THAT is the objective. Not trying to get every last watt out of every note in every song. That's simply not possible and should not be attempted.

In this video I compared the DD-1 to my Fluke 123 Scopemeter... or rather verified the waveform vs when the DD-1 detected distortion. The results are within.

Please take a look and subscribe.

Please don't forget to subscribe