Jmoney2544

why so? if there both cea-certified then why would i miss out on 40 extra watts? I need some explantions. i want to go with the rf but im thinking to myself that i will miss out on some extra power

how could a cea-certified amp be overrated? they have to pass all kinds of tests right?

Both Amp are about the same price but i dont know which one to get I want to choose which ever one will play my speaker louder Rockford Fosgate 50 Watt Amp http://www.sonicelectronix.com/item_19566_Rockford-Fosgate-PRIME-R300-4.html Pioneer 60 Watt Amp http://www.sonicelectronix.com/item_16645_Pioneer-GM-6400F.html Both amp are cea-certified so i would pick the pionner cause it has 10 more watts to each speaker. (40 more watts total) Just to make sure im buying the better amp, whats your guys opinion?

did rockford come out with a new line of subs? p1,2,3 to r1,2,3?

u should get the aq2200d for that btl. ive heard great reviews on there amps and its below $400 moar powarr warhorse then... or RF15k

u should get the aq2200d for that btl. ive heard great reviews on there amps and its below $400

thanks for the input guys. Really helped me out because i wasnt to sure about pioneer subs. true they do sell them at walmart!

Your link didn't work. IMO I would go with the AQ, but I am biased. And the truth is, AQ has a much better quality control reputation and better customer service. And FYI, there are not supposed to be VS threads here.. link works now. are those pioneer subs loud?

I Like Loud, Low Bass That Slaps. Originally I was going to get... (2) Audioque SDC2.5 15's (1) Audioque 1200D ($606)(Total 1200 Watts RMS) Or (2)Pioneer TS-W3002D4 (1000 Watt 12's) (http://www.sonicelectronix.com/item_16665_Pioneer-TS-W3002D4.html) (1)Audioque 2200D ($700)(Total 2200 Watts RMS) I was surprised on how cheap i could get them... $160 for a 1000 watt cea-certified brand sub! Do you guys think it worth 100 bucks more for the second setup? what's your opinion on those pioneers? I Like sql Setups

you think 5" will be good for no port noise with a 6 cube box

need at least a 6" port width for these subs. cant do it in the front. i might try triangle ports

the port wall doesnt extend to the one side 7". not the same

All the Dimensions Are On The Sketch Except For The Height Which Is 17". Check Top Of Paper For Cubes, And Tuning. http://s303.photobucket.com/albums/nn150/Jmoney2544/?action=view&current=ham020.jpg

subs call for 3-4.5 cubes each so it needs to be big...

17"

what do you suggest i do? make the box semetrical and lose about .5-1 cubes?

there not facing the cabin, there facing back

i didnt want to fire them up because ive heard its not as loud and it will rattle the hell out of your trunk even with sound deadner

Hey, I Know Ive Posted This Last Week But I didnt get a lot of feedback and didnt tell you guys 1 key thing. Inj the picture i have the port back 7" because i need at least 6" for the air to go because if i made it a perfect rectangle the port would be blocked by the walls of my trunk so i had to indent it 7". Will this box design work? If it doesnt then could you guys please tell me what i have to do? Thanks http://s303.photobucket.com/albums/nn150/Jmoney2544/?action=view&current=ithinkigotit019.jpg

Found out there 15.6 " with gasket diameter

Found out there 15.6 " with mounting diameter

are you sure because i just measured my 12" type r and it was 12.6 inches and that was a small gasket. Is there anyway i could find out?

when i had my 2 type r's it sounded best facing back. I could extend my box width to 36" in the front to 15" depth and then do a 34" width to 12 inches to make a total of 27" depth. that might give you a little more room for a port in the middle. also i dont know what the diameter of the subs are with the black mounting part. is it still 15"? or more?

is there a sound difference from putting the subs up to facing them back? would putting the subs up have less bass?