Jump to content

Bradprobert

Members
  • Posts

    402
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Bradprobert

  1. the sa 10s needs 1 cube to 1.25 cubes. i would range my tuning from 32 to 35 which ever you prefer. but the 32 hz would prob sound the best in my opinion. i have 2 e10 subs in a box tuned to 34 hz and they sound really good but still think 32 makes most of the high bass sound better. i have the cut sheet for my box if your interested. everything is about the same for the e10s and sa10s for box volume.

    Tuning lower won't make the "high bass" sound better.

    my brother has the same subs and its tuned 32 and it sounds a little better idk. im not a expert but some high notes sound a little cleaner on the 32hz thats all im saying. just the overall sq i would say is better

    Most likely the car is causing that effect to happen or the box isnt built to spec.

  2. I have 2 sa8v2s in a 4th order and here are my mistakes that may answer some of your questions.

    1. not enough port area. i had 50 sq in which was half my cone area. it would be best to mulitply that by your xmax to get a better estimate of what your port area should be.

    2. ratio was slightly too big. it was about a 3:1 ratio. if i could do it again i would do a 2:1.

    any questions let me know i smashed my finger at a party so its kinda hard to type lol

    • Like (+1 Rep) 1
  3. you will have to increase your box volume to end up with the net volume of 0.5

    that will be after all displacements. the port is a displacement and if youre using torres, it will calculate it for you. even though its a shallow mount it will take up quite a bit of space in a ported box. for that sub and what it seems like you are trying to acheive in size, just do a sealed box.

  4. For a true full SQ setup I would shy away from any bandpass enclosures unless you plan on having other drivers that will also play the same frequency range. The reason for this is that due to the nature of how bandpasses work they do a great job at reproducing the fundamental frequencies but tend to filter out the harmonics of notes. It is the harmonics of specific instruments that give them their realism and specific sound signature. If you lose these you will lose alot of detail in your low end....just thought I would throw that out there for your consideration. If you arent dead set on a 4th, consider going another direction...

    thank you for pointing this out. i have never dealt with that much sq and am glad you said something.

  5. I was with Mike Singer when I was having issues mounting my alt and he suggested a 2:1 ratio for 4th order bandpasses

    from the research and experience i have, it would all depend on the application of what you are trying to do. the ratio basically just changes the gain factor of the box at a particular frequency. that's why you'll hear a 3:1 is more peaky than an 2:1. 2:1 is used for most general sub applications.

    Edit: the reason is for the frequency response of the box tends to be somewhat the smoothest.

  6. Well it seems like theres a short list of people who got a meade install. At this point, its like getting a car done by foose. Looks really good, I just wish I had half the work ethic you and some of the other guys on the forum do, its difficult for me to get motivated now a days with so much stuff I have to get done :)

    Good work man, keep it up!

    If you love doing it that should be enough SELF motivation! No lazieness allowed! Haha

×
×
  • Create New...