Never Satisfied Posted June 14, 2011 Report Posted June 14, 2011 4 TS8512-44 subs. "mtx squares" 750rms/1500max Amp is the newer mmats 3000.5(supposed to be 3300 rms) have to bench and see fs 30.90 qts .784 vas 2.412 Was looking to see if these subs would work out in a low Hz box 27-30... Was thinking like 18cube gross with 250sq inch of port... Or 16.25 gross with 180 sq inch of port... Going in a 05 durango eather wall or crx style box... Any help on box and sq inch of port is apprecitated.... I'll have pics up some time tomorrow Ipad won't load them.... http://i80.photobucket.com/albums/j177/JLsHotSopt/Never%20Satisfied/IMG_20110603_180257.jpg If you are ever satisfied, sounds like you gave up... Never Satisfied ~Team Ns~
stigmata79 Posted June 14, 2011 Report Posted June 14, 2011 Id go for the 18 gross, 180 sq in port . What were you planning to tune the port(s) to? Techn9ition ya dig?
Never Satisfied Posted June 14, 2011 Author Report Posted June 14, 2011 Id go for the 18 gross, 180 sq in port . What were you planning to tune the port(s) to? 27-30hz range If you are ever satisfied, sounds like you gave up... Never Satisfied ~Team Ns~
Never Satisfied Posted June 14, 2011 Author Report Posted June 14, 2011 Id go for the 18 gross, 180 sq in port . What were you planning to tune the port(s) to? 27-30hz range Thinking one port unless better to go with two If you are ever satisfied, sounds like you gave up... Never Satisfied ~Team Ns~
stigmata79 Posted June 14, 2011 Report Posted June 14, 2011 Well if your wanting that range I'd say two. If you wanting more db out of your set, then go with the 1. Personally for the subs you have I'd go for One, see how it sounds, then determine if you want another Techn9ition ya dig?
stigmata79 Posted June 14, 2011 Report Posted June 14, 2011 And for port, were you goin rectangle or circle? Techn9ition ya dig?
Never Satisfied Posted June 14, 2011 Author Report Posted June 14, 2011 And for port, were you goin rectangle or circle? I have seam to have better luck with rectangle/square ports on a lower hz box... If you are ever satisfied, sounds like you gave up... Never Satisfied ~Team Ns~
Never Satisfied Posted June 14, 2011 Author Report Posted June 14, 2011 4 TS8512-44 subs. "mtx squares" 750rms/1500max Amp is the newer mmats 3000.5(supposed to be 3300 rms) have to bench and see fs 30.90 qts .784 vas 2.412 Was looking to see if these subs would work out in a low Hz box 27-30... Was thinking like 18cube gross with 250sq inch of port... Or 16.25 gross with 180 sq inch of port... Going in a 05 durango eather wall or crx style box... Any help on box and sq inch of port is apprecitated.... I'll have pics up some time tomorrow Ipad won't load them.... I guess what I'm asking is more port area,and more cubes better for a ground pounder,or a smaller cube box and small port... Or even more cubes and a small port... Thanks, I'm just hoping to get close on the first box so I get the next box on point.... If you are ever satisfied, sounds like you gave up... Never Satisfied ~Team Ns~
stigmata79 Posted June 15, 2011 Report Posted June 15, 2011 Well, In my opinion I would go for the bigger box. But I have this kicker box calculator app, If you give me the specs of one the subs I could see what they recommend. Ive used it numerous times, boxes came out sounding just how I wanted. Techn9ition ya dig?
Never Satisfied Posted June 15, 2011 Author Report Posted June 15, 2011 Well, In my opinion I would go for the bigger box. But I have this kicker box calculator app, If you give me the specs of one the subs I could see what they recommend. Ive used it numerous times, boxes came out sounding just how I wanted. fs 30.90 qms 8.53 cms .098 mms 271.52 Rms 6.17 vas 2.412 Xmas .800 d 10.236 sd 108.81 vd 76.19 qes .86 re 1.61 bi 9.92 qts .784 no .224% splo 86.63db Spl 93.60db Thanks... And for a ground pounder is a order box better to go with or just a simply old ported box... If you are ever satisfied, sounds like you gave up... Never Satisfied ~Team Ns~
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.