Jump to content

CJ18

18+ All Access!
  • Posts

    13098
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

Posts posted by CJ18

  1. Actually the amount of current that it sucked seems really high. Why 400a? Isn't it supposed to be fused for 300a?

    The amperage readings are not 100% accurate. The clamp is set on peak hold. So it reads the entire time the test is being run. The Dyno stops reading at clipping. The amp may still be putting out power into clipping and the clamp still reading current being drawn, but the dyno has stopped reading power at the point the clipping occurs.

    The only way to get a 100% accurate reading would to have a dcA clamp built into the dyno pulling that reading at the same exact time as it is pulling the rest of its readings. I would be willing to send my dyno back to D'Amore to be modded if something like this were ever able to be done.

    Wonder If it pulls the same or less on a dynamic run? The pure sine wave is definitely a lot of work for it.

    Clamp doesnt read fast enough to keep up with the sample rate of dynamic testing.

    Well then take a set of 1/0 to 4 gauge and put them on and try. see what that does.

    Sold my last set that I had in stock. I am waiting for my next batch to be delivered.

  2. Actually the amount of current that it sucked seems really high. Why 400a? Isn't it supposed to be fused for 300a?

    The amperage readings are not 100% accurate. The clamp is set on peak hold. So it reads the entire time the test is being run. The Dyno stops reading at clipping. The amp may still be putting out power into clipping and the clamp still reading current being drawn, but the dyno has stopped reading power at the point the clipping occurs.

    The only way to get a 100% accurate reading would to have a dcA clamp built into the dyno pulling that reading at the same exact time as it is pulling the rest of its readings. I would be willing to send my dyno back to D'Amore to be modded if something like this were ever able to be done.

  3. Imo you should have did the single run WITHOUT the block.

    Obviously double the wire isnt in question. Double the wire is obviously better. The question imo is the reduced CONTACT AREA of using the distro block.

    A single bare ended wire input into a standard amp terminal will have thousands of contact points to deliver the power.

    By using a distro you now only have 2 points of contact going into the amp. Set screw against top of the block. Block against bottom of amp input..

    So imo the test should be two fold.

    Does a single run without the block differ than a single run with the block?

    And what is the difference between normal single run and dual using the block.

    No one buys buys those blocks just to continue running one wire... so really that test was silly.

    You normally go from one single run to tm block dual runs.. which was not shown.

    Redo plz.

    Edit: grammar etc.

    I did the test with bare wire vs the input and there was a 2w difference. If that is significant enough for you to want to see, sorry, I dont feel like testing it. I will do the same test jsut to disprove the people that think using an input vs not using 1 makes a difference.

×
×
  • Create New...