fr34kout
Members-
Posts
497 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Media Demo
Store
Collections
Videos
Everything posted by fr34kout
-
You've probably seen my pics either here or Trailvoy but I'll post up a couple. Also somebody on Trailvoy is running 2 SMD 18's either May03LT or UnderLok I forget who. My current box is about 6.3 cubes tuned to 33 hz, about to be building a new box close to 8 cubes tuned to 30 hz so we'll see how that turns out. 147.6 (or 147.8 ) was my highest with the D2 SMD @ 39hz, direct swap with my friends D1 2nd gen BTL got 150.3 @ 39 hz. Edit: Had to fix the stupid smiley that came up lol. Oh and link to my build if you're interested http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/81025-08-envoy-denali-18-aa-smd-build-log-150-db-39-hz/
-
lol you mad bro?
-
D3100 is bigger than 9x7x6, but maybe a D3400 would fit if you have a little wiggle room.
-
Contradicting much? Get a Diehard Platnium if you want to save money, if not do it right the first time and get an XS Power battery.
-
Adding on to what he said, when you wire in parallel you drop the ohm load in half. When you wire in series you double the ohm load. When you're dealing with multiple subs do it in steps. So say you want to wire 4 D4 subs together to 1 monoblock. Each D4 sub can be wired to 2 ohms on it's ohm when you run them in parallel. Then you can wire 2 of these 2 ohm subs together in parallel again to get 1 ohm per pair of subs, Then you can wire the 2 pairs of subs together in series to get back up to 2 ohms, or in parallel to drop down to half ohm.
-
Where did he say he was from hawaii? A fast google search shows Kelowan / Okanagan (in his sig) as part of Canada? I'm from Hawaii and when I ordered my alt it was shipped out on a thursday and got it the following tuesday but never got a tracking number. Call Matt, he always answered his phone when I called.
-
has anyone used a DSO nano for tuning yet?
fr34kout replied to dohckiller808's topic in TOOLS and TESTING Devices
2400 @ 3.3 ohms is about 89 volts, into 500k should be 6 hundred thousandths of an amp. It'll be fine lol -
has anyone used a DSO nano for tuning yet?
fr34kout replied to dohckiller808's topic in TOOLS and TESTING Devices
Can start small wednesday if you want. My 100.4 is bridged so ~300 watts, then can step up to my 4500 which is only about ~2400 clamped before you try the big boy. Up to you. Edit: That and I kind of want to re-oscope both amps lol -
has anyone used a DSO nano for tuning yet?
fr34kout replied to dohckiller808's topic in TOOLS and TESTING Devices
Well the whole point of seeing the wave clipping is to prevent it, if it's no accurate then what's the point of using it? Try it side by side with a known Oscope and see if one shows clipping before the other. If they both indicate clipping at the same time, you're golden. -
has anyone used a DSO nano for tuning yet?
fr34kout replied to dohckiller808's topic in TOOLS and TESTING Devices
Just make sure your car is running -
has anyone used a DSO nano for tuning yet?
fr34kout replied to dohckiller808's topic in TOOLS and TESTING Devices
There was a couple of threads about this maybe 2 weeks ago? 1 was asking about the product, 1 was a follow up video. You could clearly see when the wave started clipping, although I'm not sure if they ever tried it vs a true Oscope. Maybe ask Art (I think he just picked up a Fluke Oscope recently) or someone if you could test this vs a known good oscope. -
Yea just messing with you haha
-
Wall at the A-pillar, say wut? But yea what he said, you could have 10 12's and still not do a hair trick if your box isn't designed properly, don't have enough power, etc. Some people can do it with single subs, it all depends.
-
As long as you have the proper port area, the size of the aero ports shouldn't make a difference.
-
Here's a clamp test from our local Class C champ, 156.3 with 2 AQ 12's and a LOT of knowledge. "Just thought i'd share my results on reactive power testing, on the SD8K. Testing was done using 2 12" SS splx subs with a nominal impedance of .5 ohms, and a reactive impedance of 1.433 ohms after box rise. Input voltage to the amp was 11.9vdc. Test frequency was 54hz. 3 fluke true rms meters were used for the test. Here is what i got= 93.2v 65a So thats 6,058 watts @ 1.43 ohms, with an input voltage of 11.9vdc. very impressive to say the least, and all from an amp only 17.5" long. Efficiency was right around 84 percent, which is very good. Any questions regarding the test are welcomed. Aloha, don."