gattiboy13 Posted November 8, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 If I bridge to use only two channels and I have an 80-prs deck will I lose a lot of functions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gattiboy13 Posted November 8, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 that rockford one does not look great for a competing SQ system. SQ and Loud equals money, I couldn't suggest an amp in the 300 dollar range that does 150rms x 4 If you did want to increase your budget I like running a separate amp per speaker. Actually I was thinking of running two 2 channel amps, like the Pioneer PRS series? These http://www.sonicelectronix.com/item_43536_Pioneer-PRS-D800.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HunterJohnson Posted November 8, 2013 Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 damn your in the same boat I was in. The PRS80 is definitely NOT for a 4 way set up. High, Mid, Midbass, Subwoofer. The problem I had is splitting my mid range and mid. I like to give my mids more power when they are lower/in the doors and mids in the a pillar. So with my PRS 80 my time alignment will always be a little off because I split the mid range RCA to my midbass and mids. I tried to keep my mid/high on the same RCA but the high only went down to 1.2k Scion tC SQ BuildiPad mini, lots of fabrication, daily drivenFord Explorer C Pillar Wall Build Just a cheap car to destroy with bass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gattiboy13 Posted November 8, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 damn your in the same boat I was in. The PRS80 is definitely NOT for a 4 way set up. High, Mid, Midbass, Subwoofer. The problem I had is splitting my mid range and mid. I like to give my mids more power when they are lower/in the doors and mids in the a pillar. So with my PRS 80 my time alignment will always be a little off because I split the mid range RCA to my midbass and mids. I tried to keep my mid/high on the same RCA but the high only went down to 1.2k Really...well damn they seemed nice...haHAH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin M Posted November 8, 2013 Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 Two pairs of 3 way comp sets on even 125 watts will get plenty loud. Remember you will see an increase in volume (~3db) when you double the speakers. I would think that would keep up with a 150 db setup if you are planning something that loud. Thank you for that info. Well then who makes an outstanding pure SQ amp in that range, not just power but SQ You might be able to find some zapco or old soundstream reference under 300 on ebay. Audison comes to mind too. 2005 Ford Focus zx4 AMT's and Planars 18" Infinite baffle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HunterJohnson Posted November 8, 2013 Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 damn your in the same boat I was in. The PRS80 is definitely NOT for a 4 way set up. High, Mid, Midbass, Subwoofer. The problem I had is splitting my mid range and mid. I like to give my mids more power when they are lower/in the doors and mids in the a pillar. So with my PRS 80 my time alignment will always be a little off because I split the mid range RCA to my midbass and mids. I tried to keep my mid/high on the same RCA but the high only went down to 1.2k Really...well damn they seemed nice...haHAH theyre fantastic! They work but not perfectly. I want the dex99 now because that bad boy has 4 preouts for my 4 way system just comes at a 1k price tag The auto eq on the prs90 is great so I cannot wiat to use it on the 99 Scion tC SQ BuildiPad mini, lots of fabrication, daily drivenFord Explorer C Pillar Wall Build Just a cheap car to destroy with bass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gattiboy13 Posted November 8, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 Two pairs of 3 way comp sets on even 125 watts will get plenty loud. Remember you will see an increase in volume (~3db) when you double the speakers. I would think that would keep up with a 150 db setup if you are planning something that loud. Thank you for that info. Well then who makes an outstanding pure SQ amp in that range, not just power but SQ You might be able to find some zapco or old soundstream reference under 300 on ebay. Audison comes to mind too. yA WELL THIS IS THE AMP I WAS THINKING AT FIRST TO ORDER http://www.onlinecarstereo.com/CarAudio/p_20680_Soundstream_REF4920.aspx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
truthsayer Posted November 8, 2013 Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 Here is a link for the pioneer GM-D8604 and its on sale. http://www.amazon.com/Pioneer-Class-4-Channel-Bridgeable-Amplifier/dp/B00A02PG0C/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1383881158&sr=8-1&keywords=pioneer+8604 truthsayer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevin M Posted November 8, 2013 Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 Two pairs of 3 way comp sets on even 125 watts will get plenty loud. Remember you will see an increase in volume (~3db) when you double the speakers. I would think that would keep up with a 150 db setup if you are planning something that loud. Thank you for that info. Well then who makes an outstanding pure SQ amp in that range, not just power but SQ You might be able to find some zapco or old soundstream reference under 300 on ebay. Audison comes to mind too. yA WELL THIS IS THE AMP I WAS THINKING AT FIRST TO ORDER http://www.onlinecarstereo.com/CarAudio/p_20680_Soundstream_REF4920.aspx That's a good choice. They were the ones I was thinking of. 2005 Ford Focus zx4 AMT's and Planars 18" Infinite baffle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gattiboy13 Posted November 8, 2013 Author Report Share Posted November 8, 2013 Here is a link for the pioneer GM-D8604 and its on sale. http://www.amazon.com/Pioneer-Class-4-Channel-Bridgeable-Amplifier/dp/B00A02PG0C/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1383881158&sr=8-1&keywords=pioneer+8604 How are these? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.