mrd6 Posted September 19, 2014 Report Posted September 19, 2014 Tall and skinny will provide more cone control both doors open...in my 6th I found tall and skinny 23" tall and 13" wide sounded better on music but was a few tenths quieter at peak than the similarly sized and tuned square ports I have tried. I'll be going back to tall and skinny soon. My Build Log: http://www.stevemead...-sundown-power/ Team NorthWestSPL
fecupe2001 Posted September 19, 2014 Report Posted September 19, 2014 Lots of people say i´m wrong, but, bigger power (along with few other things) meant bigger port area on MY application, same thing on my boy pipo sanchez truck, with small power i got louder with only 410 SQ of port for 8 15s on less than 2000 watts clamped at peak frequency, right now i have around 520 SQ of port and 2600 clamped doing close to 156 @ 40 hz. BTW, round overs dropped my score on the TL and ear-o-meter no matter what i did, some people say they really help once you have tons of power, hope i can find out myself in a few months when i see about 8K clamped I´m the SPL Gains topic creator!! wanna get louder?? check this: SPL Gains. Panamenian 2009 & 2010 & 2014 Bass Race 149.9 Champion! 2 15" subs and a 2K wired at 1 ohm, http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/167788-fecupe2001-2-15s-on-a-2k-video-on-page-3/ 8 Massive 15" subs and small power, http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/179296-fecupe2001s-8-15s-4th-order-bandpass-wall/
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.