ChiTownTBird312 Posted March 8, 2009 Report Posted March 8, 2009 i havent heard or seen to much about these....does anybody here run these or know someone who has them? what subs are comparable to these? and i know they are supposed to be sq subs, but they look like some beasts...do they put down decent numbers? and i know im kinda all over with my questions but i dont want to make a purchase before exploring all my options.... thanks guys. Matt W. 1996 Thunderbird LX Sport 4.6 new system soon...still deciding on what to get.
Zade08 Posted March 8, 2009 Report Posted March 8, 2009 Im gone bump this as Iv been very interested in the spl potential of ss subs. When i do my sq setup i will be giving one of these 15s a shot though. Vehicle: 2001 Ford Escape Head Unit: Kenwood Kdc-x592 All out for a rebuild. New shit coming in the next 30 days.
ChiTownTBird312 Posted March 8, 2009 Author Report Posted March 8, 2009 and a little side note to my op.... im not looking for them to be complete spl monsters because i know im asking about the BTL alot. but something that can be loud as hell and take some seriousl power and sound good as hell at the same time. and have that wow factor when people hear it. Matt W. 1996 Thunderbird LX Sport 4.6 new system soon...still deciding on what to get.
Zade08 Posted March 8, 2009 Report Posted March 8, 2009 I say if you want the spl wow factor then buy an spl sub. I almost bought 2 ss rl-p 15s but ended up with my fi bl 15s for the same price and couldnt be happier. Vehicle: 2001 Ford Escape Head Unit: Kenwood Kdc-x592 All out for a rebuild. New shit coming in the next 30 days.
ChiTownTBird312 Posted March 8, 2009 Author Report Posted March 8, 2009 the other thing that got my attention with the rl-s is that they are supposed to be low end monsters and sound great too....i know the btl's arent at all aimed towards sq but do you think they pick up lows as good as the rl's? ttt Matt W. 1996 Thunderbird LX Sport 4.6 new system soon...still deciding on what to get.
Decaf Posted March 8, 2009 Report Posted March 8, 2009 for the money, id get something else they would be great in a home application in a large sealed box in a car, again, large sealed box massive amounts of excursion if i had to compare, likely a tc lms
ChiTownTBird312 Posted March 8, 2009 Author Report Posted March 8, 2009 so they arent really made to put out big spl numbers and are made really for sq? Matt W. 1996 Thunderbird LX Sport 4.6 new system soon...still deciding on what to get.
Decaf Posted March 8, 2009 Report Posted March 8, 2009 hmm, well, yes and no they need 2000w+ they get low as fawk and remain very linear throught bl curve thats more sql i would not consider them strickly spl by any means, but they will put up decent numbers, but u could spend less and get more
ChiTownTBird312 Posted March 9, 2009 Author Report Posted March 9, 2009 alright, i see what you mean. Matt W. 1996 Thunderbird LX Sport 4.6 new system soon...still deciding on what to get.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.