Jump to content

RF or RE?


nitro229

Recommended Posts

power handling does by no means determin sq

I picked up an MTX Sw1212 powered subwoofer today. This thing sounds amazing. 130 watts, 12" woofer with a passive 12" woofer tuned to 27 hz. Moving the pictures on the walls and my girl got wet from the bass when i showed her haha. Tonight should be good haha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would get the RF,the re's sound decent but wasnt impressed with the two times I heard them, although that could be due to shitty installation. On the contrary i have heard numerous RF setups that I liked. Although that's just my opinion.

DAT 4125------>RE XXX comps active

Eclipse cd7000

I serve drunks for a living :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have you looked in polk or the high end pioneers? Ive used both and was really impressed...

HU...Pioneer 5900IB

Wireing...Stinger

Amps...(1) Modded Stetsom 2K6..

Batts...(1) Stinger 2150

SPL Subs...(2) DD 9515 Hybrids

Daily Subs..(1) Mmats P3.0 15

N.S.P.L.

2012 NC State Record Trunk 1801-3600

2012 World Record Trunk 1801-3600

2011 NC State Record No Wall 0-24"

2011 NC State Record No Wall 0-24" Hardcore

2011 World Record No Wall 0-24"

2011 World Record No Wall 0-24" Hardcore

2010 World Record No Wall 0-2500w

2010 NC State Record No Wall 0-2500w

2009 NC State Record No Wall 0-24"

2009 NC State Record No Wall Hardcore 0-24"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If your choosing between just RF or RE i would go RF. Ive heard both. I dont know what the RE verse RF cost wise but I think the RF are cleaner at high volume. just my opinion :popcorn:

Xterra * 69 Camaro * Audi S5

36 Ford * 51 Mercury 

looking for wire sponsor :) 

www.flyracing.com

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...