OcBish

pls delete

http://wimp.com/tedwilliams/ this is his first commercial

I think i have brain damage in that part ..

What do fully blind ppl see when they dream?

i dont really have a sleeping issue, and not really a fan of pills.. Bud is my candy of choice..

Maybe its more of just clear my head.. Owell ill enjoy some of the music i downloaded and see how things work out.. Thanks for the input guys..

That would piss me off more.. I suck at video games lol

You guys are crazy.. lol

Lol i try to talk to ppl on a higher level then me..I like to learn and just talk to very mature ppl.. Most ppl my age (20-25) are childish, and it annoys me to talk to them.. I actually been going out and meeting new ppl around the area and try lower my standards on my friends.. Sex isnt really and issue for me as i get that when needed.. Bass kinda pumps me up more then relaxes me...( unless im pissed) Maybe ill hit up one of the many st pete beaches and just walk the sand and enjoy the nice water..

Na i toke to try and relax and that has slowly stopped working.. I dont drink beer and do any hard drugs, i went on youtube and looked up like relaxing music and stuff.. I did some google searching to try find some ideas.. Just wanna empty my mind and losing up ..

Ok so ive had so much stress over the past 5 months, and the future doesnt look to be changing for the best .. I have a million plus things on my mind, that just keep going and going.. Just wonder what you all do to help you relief stress and relax your mind and body.. Not talking about bass.. Just like breathing, meditation, music, things like that.. Not looking to spend money just some little relaxation methods i can try out..i been getting out and meeting ppl on the area.( just moved to st pete) Tho nothing seems to help.. I know everyone has issues and not asking for a pity party or anything just wondering if anyone has methods they use to relax them.. Or maybe some kinda relaxation music..

four loco

WTF!?!?! Wouldnt a trim panel have been easier and a hell of alot cheaper? That foam is like 4$ a can, im sure you used about 20 cans lol...

Yea i was shocked to, But thats what it says.. 2001-2010 civic and cr-v....

Ok i have been having a few issues lately with my 2002 civic and i cant find the haynes manual in a torrent or pdf.. I know they are online but i havent had any luck finding it. I dont want to spend 20 bucks to buy it, if i didnt i wouldnt be asking for help... If anyone has the file or can send me a link that would be amazing.. Its for a 2001-2010 civic is the manual i need.. Thanks in advance and happy holidays to all..

Other people wont be able to send you stuff because they won't even be able to get it. Do you go to any other forums besides SMD? If so kiss them goodbye. Youtube will cost you extra. Stubleupon, extra. Facebook, extra. Everything will cost, which will cause them to go wayyyy down in user count, which will cause them to stop making money, which will mean the thousands of people who work for companies such as Google, Ebay, Youtube, Facebook, etc., will LOSE their job. You think that will help the economy? The internet has done so much more good than bad, and you cannot blame it for people being lazy fat fucks. Alcohol does't cause alcoholics, cigarettes don't cause smokers. People choose how they wan't to be, and I would bet that without the internet, people will find another way to be fat and lazy.

Not the porn!!!!!

Guess its good i dont really download stuff.. I usually have other ppl do it and send it to me lol... I mean idk it could be a good thing, it will get ppl out the house and doing more productive things... Maybe we wont be the fattest country in the world in 10yrs or so.. Hell it may just may even help the economy a lil... HAHA SIKE.. Weed will help the economy tho, and its safer then cigs and booze but thats not what this is about..

No i dont deny it one but that americans are lazy fat fucks.. I was talking to a female friend the other day about how so many ppl have forgot how to actually meet ppl and live a real life out in public, due to video games and the web.. But damn give us a fucking break, if your gonna take the web legalize pot ..

Uhh, good luck with looking for that link............ I dont need luck its called actually looking but thanks..

They do that already? At least some ISP's do. Idk but i know my web is just normal from my phone/ cable company.. They also said cable companies wont be able to provide the services.. I could be wrong about what i was understanding... The link i posted is all i found, but its basically what was on tv.. Fox 35 dont have the actual report on there site..

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703395204576023452250748540.html

Tomorrow morning the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will mark the winter solstice by taking an unprecedented step to expand government's reach into the Internet by attempting to regulate its inner workings. In doing so, the agency will circumvent Congress and disregard a recent court ruling. How did the FCC get here? For years, proponents of so-called "net neutrality" have been calling for strong regulation of broadband "on-ramps" to the Internet, like those provided by your local cable or phone companies. Rules are needed, the argument goes, to ensure that the Internet remains open and free, and to discourage broadband providers from thwarting consumer demand. That sounds good if you say it fast. David Klein Nothing is broken that needs fixing, however. The Internet has been open and freedom-enhancing since it was spun off from a government research project in the early 1990s. Its nature as a diffuse and dynamic global network of networks defies top-down authority. Ample laws to protect consumers already exist. Furthermore, the Obama Justice Department and the European Commission both decided this year that net-neutrality regulation was unnecessary and might deter investment in next-generation Internet technology and infrastructure. Analysts and broadband companies of all sizes have told the FCC that new rules are likely to have the perverse effect of inhibiting capital investment, deterring innovation, raising operating costs, and ultimately increasing consumer prices. Others maintain that the new rules will kill jobs. By moving forward with Internet rules anyway, the FCC is not living up to its promise of being "data driven" in its pursuit of mandates—i.e., listening to the needs of the market. Your Digital Fingerprint Websites Move to Curb Cookies How Advertisers Use Internet Cookies to Track You It wasn't long ago that bipartisan and international consensus centered on insulating the Internet from regulation. This policy was a bright hallmark of the Clinton administration, which oversaw the Internet's privatization. Over time, however, the call for more Internet regulation became imbedded into a 2008 presidential campaign promise by then-Sen. Barack Obama. So here we are. Last year, FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski started to fulfill this promise by proposing rules using a legal theory from an earlier commission decision (from which I had dissented in 2008) that was under court review. So confident were they in their case, FCC lawyers told the federal court of appeals in Washington, D.C., that their theory gave the agency the authority to regulate broadband rates, even though Congress has never given the FCC the power to regulate the Internet. FCC leaders seemed caught off guard by the extent of the court's April 6 rebuke of the commission's regulatory overreach. In May, the FCC leadership floated the idea of deeming complex and dynamic Internet services equivalent to old-fashioned monopoly phone services, thereby triggering price-and-terms regulations that originated in the 1880s. The announcement produced what has become a rare event in Washington: A large, bipartisan majority of Congress agreeing on something. More than 300 members of Congress, including 86 Democrats, contacted the FCC to implore it to stop pursuing Internet regulation and to defer to Capitol Hill. Facing a powerful congressional backlash, the FCC temporarily changed tack and convened negotiations over the summer with a select group of industry representatives and proponents of Internet regulation. Curiously, the commission abruptly dissolved the talks after Google and Verizon, former Internet-policy rivals, announced their own side agreement for a legislative blueprint. Yes, the effort to reach consensus was derailed by . . . consensus. After a long August silence, it appeared that the FCC would defer to Congress after all. Agency officials began working with House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman on a draft bill codifying network management rules. No Republican members endorsed the measure. Later, proponents abandoned the congressional effort to regulate the Net. More on Technology Still feeling quixotic pressure to fight an imaginary problem, the FCC leadership this fall pushed a small group of hand-picked industry players toward a "choice" between a bad option (broad regulation already struck down in April by the D.C. federal appeals court) or a worse option (phone monopoly-style regulation). Experiencing more coercion than consensus or compromise, a smaller industry group on Dec. 1 gave qualified support for the bad option. The FCC's action will spark a billable-hours bonanza as lawyers litigate the meaning of "reasonable" network management for years to come. How's that for regulatory certainty? To date, the FCC hasn't ruled out increasing its power further by using the phone monopoly laws, directly or indirectly regulating rates someday, or expanding its reach deeper into mobile broadband services. The most expansive regulatory regimes frequently started out modest and innocuous before incrementally growing into heavy-handed behemoths. On this winter solstice, we will witness jaw-dropping interventionist chutzpah as the FCC bypasses branches of our government in the dogged pursuit of needless and harmful regulation. The darkest day of the year may end up marking the beginning of a long winter's night for Internet freedom.