bassrace Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 Honestly I would stay away from AQ. If you have the money get the RF. Why would you stay away from AQ? 145.9@40hz 145.3@34hz big 3 X2 group 34 Deka Group 31 All 0/1 awg jl meta wire Alpine CDA 7894 Orion HCCA D5000 2 AQ HDC312's Crunch gpv1100.2 (for 6.5"s only) AQ pro audio 6.5" - 3 sets AQ supertweeters - 2 sets 2000 Slamry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AA98hoe Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 Why not step up to the 3500.1 and be done. I'm pushing 2500w plus to my xls and they need more power imo. Don't get me wrong they are loud I just want it louder. 3000 t0 3800 is the upper max TEAM DC AUDIO VEHICLE:98 chevy tahoe 2wd 3-4 drop HEADUNIT:alpine 9886 PREAMP:arcaudio FRONT STAGE:4-6 1/2s selinium,DD component set and 4-selinium tweeters in each door KICKPANELS:jl audio 5 1/4 REAR DOORS: dd components 6 1/2s HIGHS AMPS:zapco 750.2 on front doors,zapco an another 750.2 on kicks and rear doors SUBS:4-ascendant audio 18s with 5 spiders in a custom box built by KINGSUV SUB AMP: 2-dc7.5s ALTERNATORS: 3-mechmans 1- 425comp, 1-smd spec350, 1-270 with adj voltage harness on custom dc bracket WIRE:10-runs 0g front to back BATTERIES:6-d1400s TL results:157.1 at 38hz and 156.8 at headrest score @37hz. STATE AND NATIONAL RECORD IN MECA S5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yessam430 Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 never owned AQ products,but I'm a RF fan boy, plus the two ohm stability is awesome. -2fi ssd 15's -1 2200 Power Acoustiq mono ...TO BE CONTINUED... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nine8SST Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 Fosgate.....because they last. But I dont know anything about AQ, are they durable? 1998 SS/T Ram Build Log - Kenwood KVT-514 and KNA-G510 Navigation - 2 DC Level 3 12" - Components??? - Sundown ??? - Sundown??? - Knu Konceptz - Second Skin Dampy Pro - XS D6500 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bassrace Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 If the same price which I doubt id run the rockford only because running at 2 ohms it would be easier on voltage. Not true, still pulls the same amount of amperage, but it is more efficient at 2 ohms. Which means more power in the long run. So running 2500rms@2ohms and running 2500 [email protected] on the same electrical the voltage would not be better @2ohms? 145.9@40hz 145.3@34hz big 3 X2 group 34 Deka Group 31 All 0/1 awg jl meta wire Alpine CDA 7894 Orion HCCA D5000 2 AQ HDC312's Crunch gpv1100.2 (for 6.5"s only) AQ pro audio 6.5" - 3 sets AQ supertweeters - 2 sets 2000 Slamry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoudNLow931 Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 Honestly I would stay away from AQ. If you have the money get the RF. Why would you stay away from AQ? I had nothing but problems with the AQs I had, they hate low voltage and warm weather. 2008 Dodge Ram 2500 6.7l Cummins 4 FT1s C1600.2 8 PWX 8s ONX2.100 Audio Technix Wiring & Sound Deadener My Youtube Feedback Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bassrace Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 Honestly I would stay away from AQ. If you have the money get the RF. Why would you stay away from AQ? I had nothing but problems with the AQs I had, they hate low voltage and warm weather. I bet. 145.9@40hz 145.3@34hz big 3 X2 group 34 Deka Group 31 All 0/1 awg jl meta wire Alpine CDA 7894 Orion HCCA D5000 2 AQ HDC312's Crunch gpv1100.2 (for 6.5"s only) AQ pro audio 6.5" - 3 sets AQ supertweeters - 2 sets 2000 Slamry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DCmagnum Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 The new rockford amps are bad ass I have a 1000.4 and the 400.4 they are very nice powerful amps! And I hate dd and Aq dd same people ="Impact"] pioneer 4200 dvd 4 sets aa carbon mids 2 sets rockford power t1 tweeters rockford power t400.4 rockford power 4inch DC 175.4 DC 3.5k (soon to be 2) 2 DC XL 15s The artist formally known as willie3719 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RickyFriery97 Posted September 6, 2011 Author Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 ive had no problems with my AQ what so ever, and im trading it for a T2500BDCP plus a few other things. im not really looking for this to be a upgrade in powa, even though i hope it might be. i like the fact that ill be running @ 2 ohms vs .5 ohms and possibly be getting just as much if not more power. plus better efficiency plus the amp is just plain sexy 2014 Chevy Silverado Crewcab 1994 Chevy Full Size blazer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C-Fizzy Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 If the same price which I doubt id run the rockford only because running at 2 ohms it would be easier on voltage. Not true, still pulls the same amount of amperage, but it is more efficient at 2 ohms. Which means more power in the long run. So running 2500rms@2ohms and running 2500 [email protected] on the same electrical the voltage would not be better @2ohms? 2500 rms is 2500 rms. No matter what ohm load the amp is being ran at, you're still pulling x amount of amps. BUT, at 2 ohms, that amp will run more efficiently than at .5 ohm. under construction I hate People with crappy primered cars rolling on hubcaps that are louder then me. u hate c-fizzy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.