Sanitarium Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 There is NO way those boxes are tuned correctly with that sorta port and that LONG of a port. here, try this on for size: 20 high, 48 wide, 47 deep, 6 deep for the front section to help adapt it to the smaller hole you'll have to cut. port is 14x10 , 18 long total. Tuning will be roughly 36 hz. I've done 152@45hz with this box with 2 aq hdc3 18's and 2 aq2200's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldsBoomer Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 What he said. Or maybe a slot port...should be more efficient. Suburban Coming Soon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tubatimmy Posted February 8, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 I love that design. I knew they couldn't be tuned right. Dont have much experience building boxs like this. Haven't quiet figured out how to make it look right and work right just yet. But ill probably go with a box like that you drew up for me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tubatimmy Posted February 8, 2012 Author Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 Is that sketch up you were using? Mind sending me a copy of the file if so Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
412 CVX Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 are you trying to do bandpass or just regular ported? You should really have one designed around your subs... Just say no to Ground Pounder Customs. My temp system build log More box buildssome cars do over 170db with one sub, so clearly my two 12"s can do that in my car, with my knowledge too! look out bitches! I'm with captain stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OldsBoomer Posted February 8, 2012 Report Share Posted February 8, 2012 That boxes tunning will work well for those subs and you want around 15.25" sq inches per cube and like 5.75-6.25 cubes per sub. Less power then rms go a little bigger Suburban Coming Soon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sanitarium Posted February 10, 2012 Report Share Posted February 10, 2012 What he said. Or maybe a slot port...should be more efficient. The problem with a slot port is it would be firing into a wall right directly in the path of it's port correction on both top and bottom. I love that design. I knew they couldn't be tuned right. Dont have much experience building boxs like this. Haven't quiet figured out how to make it look right and work right just yet. But ill probably go with a box like that you drew up for me Didn't draw that up for you, that's a proven design i've personally used for a year and a half with great results. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.