Jump to content
Sonic Electronix

Recommended Posts

Posted

the .3 difference isnt much at all. some subs displace that with magnets alone. and if you add 45s to the corners. the amount of output you will lose isnt anything to worry about. but if your doing a 3.2 box (net).dont do 45s you'll lose allot more. also if you run magnet out you'll keep the true tune of the box

jvc deck

stinger 1800 front

hc 2000 kinetic rear

2 runs of 1/0g

big 3/4

ct 60.4

2 ct 1400.1

ct EXO 15 d1

lots of deadner

type r comps front stage

6 kicker tweets rear stage

lots of great stuff

coming soon

ho alt

more bats

ct comps for front stage

more deadner

sweet amp rack

lots of L.E.D lights

new deck (thinking 80 prs, or flip out)

Posted

A smaller box will allow mechanical control over the sub if over powering it helps prevent damage from over exertion. Doesn't do anything for heat though.

bigger boxes tend to be more efficient. Meaning less power same out put basically.

as for your box idea I can say 3.2cuft net per subs should be just fine. However you haven't mentioned port area. To small of a port and you get port noise and a poor freq response.

for 15s (pending Xmas) you usualt want at least a 6" round port per sub or roughly 40-50sq" of port area for a slot port.

t1500bdcp

2 t2d4 15"

1 t600.4

1 t400.2

1 set p1 tweets

singer alt, tons of wiring, smd vm-1, 80prs, back seat delete, still in the works, aiming for a 145-147 with the ability to play 25hz up to 50hz.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 3130 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
×
×
  • Create New...