Jump to content
Second Skin Audio

Recommended Posts

Posted

ok so make sure i've got this right. If i go with a 2 or so net cubic foot box, after i add on port, sub, and bracing displacements it shouldn't be over 3 cubes total correct? And that 20 square inches each? is that for sub or per cubic foot.

Posted

you should have 3cuft net after everything.

and 20sq in per woofer is ideal.

2008 California state record holder 157.2 Bassrace2009 California state record holder 157.0 BassraceRollin 50's 158.7db2009 King of Cali Bassrace2009 USACi score 160.5 @ 42hz
Posted
ok so make sure i've got this right. If i go with a 2 or so net cubic foot box, after i add on port, sub, and bracing displacements it shouldn't be over 3 cubes total correct? And that 20 square inches each? is that for sub or per cubic foot.

using your dimensions... 35.75W X 11T X 25D you've got 4.42 cu.ft.

Build the box that size with the 4 8's along the front of the box with a slot port along the bottom right below them.

The vent should be 34.25W X 1.25T X 18L. That will tune around 37. Divide the center of the vent with a strip of 3/4 for a brace.

Michael Hughes = 6X SPL World Champion - Loudest on the planet in db Drag, USACi, and IASCA.

Posted

That sounds like a winner.

2008 California state record holder 157.2 Bassrace2009 California state record holder 157.0 BassraceRollin 50's 158.7db2009 King of Cali Bassrace2009 USACi score 160.5 @ 42hz
Posted

Ok, now i'm confused. First to go with .75 each which adds up to 3 cubic ft, but now you are saying that the 4.42 cubic ft. box would be fine also. Sorry to be a pain, i just don't want to risk this poor fellers subs, if they were mine, i know what i would be doing the box a little differently.

Posted
Ok, now i'm confused. First to go with .75 each which adds up to 3 cubic ft, but now you are saying that the 4.42 cubic ft. box would be fine also. Sorry to be a pain, i just don't want to risk this poor fellers subs, if they were mine, i know what i would be doing the box a little differently.

4.42 is before sub@port displacement

TDH FTW !!!

Posted

ok i guess i misunderstood you then. I though when you said .75 after displacements i thought you meant that was after adding them on. So it would be like .75 cubic ft. and then add on the port and sub displacement which would make it for example like 1.1 cubes correct?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 701 Guests (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...