SQ 2200.1D

[Totalnoob]

Has anyone on here actually clamped/AMM-1/dyno test the sq2200.1d? I am curious to know if it really does rated or not because i know alot of companies like to lie on the rms wattage. Not saying soundqubed is lying, but if you have any information on this let me know or send me to the results.

[OrionStang]

SoundQubed doesn't disappoint.

[Ahmed Johnson]

I have it and love it, however here is one test result http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/188008-real-world-amp-tests/page-5

[Totalnoob]

Thanks Ahmed. Dang it those results are rather disappointing, but it is still pretty close to rated.

[OrionStang]

Thanks Ahmed. Dang it those results are rather disappointing, but it is still pretty close to rated.

That test is flawed. He didn't track voltage.

Id take SQ over Soundstream, Hifonics, etc. any day.

[Totalnoob]

It makes me wonder about SQ120.4 i heard it is getting scaled down to a 90.4. Maybe it only does 90 watts rms at 4 ohms.

[Ahmed Johnson]

It's still pretty damn good.

[Totalnoob]

Thanks Ahmed. Dang it those results are rather disappointing, but it is still pretty close to rated.

That test is flawed. He didn't track voltage.

Id take SQ over Soundstream, Hifonics, etc. any day.

what about over ct sounds? lol

[OrionStang]

I won't even go there, my comments about CT get me in trouble.

[Ahmed Johnson]

Thanks Ahmed. Dang it those results are rather disappointing, but it is still pretty close to rated.

That test is flawed. He didn't track voltage.

Id take SQ over Soundstream, Hifonics, etc. any day.

Me too. I wasn't trying to bash it at all. He was asking if anyone ever did a test here and I was showing him the one I know of. I have 2 Sq 2200 and don't give a fuck about a test result. My ears have told me they shit on every hifonics and soundstream I ever heard.