Jump to content
Sundown Audio

popcorn sounds 7k


Chubbza5

Recommended Posts

Posted
Results...

CT Sounds 7k - 7,000w resistive - 7,930w rising to .9 - 71% efficient - 158.6db

American Bass 750.1 - 6,200w resistive - 7,100w rising to .9 - 72% efficient - 158.2db.

Sundown NS-1 - 5,800w resistive - 6,550w rising to .9 - 72% efficient - .7db down from the CT.

DD M4a - 6,000w resistive - 6,490w rising to .9 - 71% efficient - 158.0db

JBL Crown 6000 - 5,200w @ 5 ohm resistive - 6,400w rising to 3 ohms - 62% efficient - 158.2db

Popcorn Sounds 6k - 5,100w resistive - 5,700w rising to .9 - 60% efficient - 157.1db. Dirty, dirty as ****.

T-Fade's testing. Yes, i saw the "6k." However, i dont see the 7 being drastically diff as far as inefficiency and "dirtiness" go

On 5/8/2011 at 7:38 PM, Kranny said:
On 5/8/2011 at 7:35 PM, 'Maxim' said:

It hurts me inside when I read stuff like this and remember you're 15

LMFAO so true

:blush:

Mitsubishi 3000GT (Old Build)

Headunit: Pioneer 80PRS

Frontstage: (2) McLaren Audio MLT-2 Tweeters & (4) PRV Audio MR Series Neo 6.5" Mids

Substage: 4 15" Hybrid Subs - Tantric Motors & Sundown Softies

Amps: Banda 2.4D Amp (Tweets), American Bass VFL 350.4 (Mids), and (2) Ampere 3800s

Electrical :Singer 260A Alt & JY Power Lithium

 

2005 Chevy Colorado Ext Cab

Headunit: Pioneer 80PRS

Frontstage: 4 PRV 700Ti Tweets & 6 10" Delta Mids on 3000wrms

Substage: 6 Fi BTL 18s in a 4th Order Walkthrough on 3 Wolfram 4500s

Electrical: Singer "390" and JY Power

My Official Feedback Thread

Posted

Just completely ignored the dirty comment lol

Well even if clean it puts out 1/2 that, it's still a good deal relative to the competition, am I wrong?

You have to bulk up your electrical more to compensate for the 10-12% lower efficiency. So no, it's not a good deal because you spend less on the amp and spend more on the batteries/alternator to keep it going.

Posted

Just completely ignored the dirty comment lol

Well even if clean it puts out 1/2 that, it's still a good deal relative to the competition, am I wrong?

You have to bulk up your electrical more to compensate for the 10-12% lower efficiency. So no, it's not a good deal because you spend less on the amp and spend more on the batteries/alternator to keep it going.

Good point, I didn't think about it that way. After seeing the internals of the amp I was blown away that he wanted $400 for it. I suppose if it's not efficient and "dirty" in the power, than it's just not that well built.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 686 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
×
×
  • Create New...