el monte Posted March 11, 2016 Report Posted March 11, 2016 What would you choose 3-scv3000d's at.5 or a scv7500 at .67 on 3-zv315's ??? in el camino @10cubes and 180sqin of port tuned to 38hz Quote
reedal Posted March 12, 2016 Report Posted March 12, 2016 Lower resistance = less efficient. Therefore, to answer "help with coming up with the most efficient setup", the 7500 at .67 would be more efficient. Which still won't be very efficient. Quote SMD Tool Map https://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/193176-smd-tool-map-new-november-2014/ Build log https://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/197217-reeds-03-tahoe-hat-sqaq-singer-xs-shca-cockbox-80prs/?page=32
ShadeTreeMechanic Posted March 12, 2016 Report Posted March 12, 2016 3 amps might have more head room than a single amp due to the total available power supply sections in the amps would probably be more than a single big amp. You might get more responses by posting this in the general amp section. Quote 91 C350 Centurion conversion ( Four Door One Ton Bronco) 250A Alternator (Second Alternator Coming Soon) G65 AGM Up Front / Two G31 AGM in Back Pioneer 80PRS CT Sounds AT125.2 / CT Sounds 6.5 Strato Pro component Front Stage CT Sounds AT125.2 / Lanzar Pro 8" coax w/compression horn tweeter Rear Fill FSD 5000D 1/2 ohm (SoundQubed 7k Coming Soon) Two HDS315 Four Qubes Each 34hz (Two HDC3.118 and New Box Coming Soon)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.