NotoriouslyLoud Posted November 8, 2007 Report Posted November 8, 2007 those FI's look sooo sick in there man good job http://www.notoriouslyloudmafia.com http://www.teamwolfpackaudio.com
bkolfo4 Posted November 9, 2007 Report Posted November 9, 2007 Man I like BTL's :D Current system: 1997 Blazer - (4) Customer Fi NEO subs with (8) American Bass Elite 2800.1s Previous systems: 2000 Suburban - (4) BTL 15's and (4) IA 40.1's = 157.7 dB at 37 Hz. 1992 Astro Van - (6) BTL 15's and (6) IA 40.1's = 159.7 dB at 43 Hz.
roscoe1129 Posted November 12, 2007 Report Posted November 12, 2007 Damn thatis absolutely in sane man! You are doing what Im trying, but I think I need a sub change.... Some people need a sympathetic pat... on the head...with my hammer Scientia est Vox "In Nomine Patris et Filii et Spiritus Sancti" DONT BE AFRAID TO USE THE SEARCH BUTTON!!! SMD SUPER BUYER/SELLER
Skip01 Posted November 13, 2007 Report Posted November 13, 2007 nice set up, and install, looks sweet... I bet that thing gets loud No need to bet, he already told us it ISSSSSSS Are those 40.1s? 2004 Explorer4 12" Type R500.1(.5 ohm)6cu@35hz153@ 44hz
--Navi-- Posted November 13, 2007 Report Posted November 13, 2007 Finally official on the USACi website: Brian dont take this the wrong way because its not meant to hate, but how are you in sb4 if you have a shop sponsoring you?
Guest MegaloManiac Posted November 14, 2007 Report Posted November 14, 2007 I plan to go hear it this weekend if I can make time for it, I have to meet up with Brian anyways for something else.
FieroGrande Posted November 14, 2007 Report Posted November 14, 2007 Be sure to take the cam to get a nice video!
Guest MegaloManiac Posted November 14, 2007 Report Posted November 14, 2007 dont take this the wrong way because its not meant to hate, but how are you in sb4 if you have a shop sponsoring you? shop is out of business
Guest Dylan Dude Posted November 15, 2007 Report Posted November 15, 2007 Is it louder than with the MT's?
bkolfo4 Posted November 15, 2007 Report Posted November 15, 2007 Shop is still open - just not at the same location, and Josh is no longer part of it. But even back then, I was just given a nice discount - not really sponsored. With BTL's and IA amps, definitely no sponsor - full price just like anyone else. At Texas Heatwave, I was told SB4 can be sponsored - just can't work for a shop. What kills me is the first time I ran SB4, the rules said "Maximum 32 points", so I could only have (4) 15's. That is why I built with (4) 15's. Now it is "open" consumer, so I may have to rebuild with more subs To me, I would definitely fit SB4 consumer vs. SB5 pro - I built this truck 100% by myself, I drive it everyday to and from work, it goes on family vacations, and it just rolled 120k miles on the way to church Sunday. . . Yes, those are 40.1's. . . As of right now, it metered 1.2 dB lower than the MT's for a burp and around 0.7 dB lower playing music, but that was install amps and subs the night before I competed, set gains by ear, and off I went. In the near future, I will strap each pair of 40.1's and run them on the BTL's at 0.5 ohms to see what kind of numbers I can get on the TL. Right now, I have one sub per amp with no strapping. With impedance rise, each 40.1 is running around 1.5 ohms, so I know they are not performing to their full potential. The MT's were running on MD3D's strapped on a 1.5 ohm load (0.7 per amp), so according to the testing I have seen on those amps, each MT was getting 4000+ watts. For metering purposes, it is too bad I never got to compare the two different subs on the same amps. . . To the ear it is a lot stronger down low playing music, which is pretty much exactly what scott told me would happen with the longer coil. At high volumes and high excursion, the MT's were moving beyond their Xmax, where the BTL's with the longer coil are not. Three friends that frequently ride in my truck could not understand how it metered lower just listening to music, because of the stronger low end. To me it is like when I went from (2) 18's to (4) 15's. The two setups metered within .3 dB of each other, but believe me when I tell you they were a world of difference listening to music. My #1 goal, which I achieved, is to be able to hammer on it without the subs heating up or an amp failing. MT's after 30 seconds had the "burning coil" smell and the dust caps were pretty darn hot. I hammered the BTL's full volume almost the entire 20 minute trip home today, and the dust caps were barely warm (and I mean almost unnoticeable), and never a hint of burning voice coil smell at any time (of course I already stated they are getting less power than my MT's were but they are also almost just as loud). I also have a pretty good feeling the 40.1's running a 1+ ohm load will be a lot more reliable than the MD3D's were strapped in pairs on 1 ohm loads. If I was starting over, I would definitely still change over to the BTL's even if it does not meter as loud with the amps strapped. Playing music at 155 dB with a stronger low end and without fear of anything failing is worth the lower score on the meter. . . . Brian Current system: 1997 Blazer - (4) Customer Fi NEO subs with (8) American Bass Elite 2800.1s Previous systems: 2000 Suburban - (4) BTL 15's and (4) IA 40.1's = 157.7 dB at 37 Hz. 1992 Astro Van - (6) BTL 15's and (6) IA 40.1's = 159.7 dB at 43 Hz.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.