andym85 Posted January 10, 2007 Report Share Posted January 10, 2007 how i would figure it texas, by using my equation is that your effective length=physical + end correction. end correction = half of the port width...so your effective length=10+2....so 12" for your effective port length, even though it is only 10" long, it is effectively 12" because of the use of the box wall for a port wall, creating the need for end correction. Quote i likes me some audio stuff... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texas Tech Posted January 10, 2007 Report Share Posted January 10, 2007 thanks for the help, its amazing how all those different equations, some easer and some harder, can give you the same tuning frequency. Here is a link to illustrate what i was trying to create with words earlier (not the same EXACT scenario, but the same idea) http://www.subwoofertools.com/forum/ported...=&Vas=&Fs=&CE=0 The board that actually creates the port is 10.25 in. long, however the baffle (the red board) is "in front" of that teal board, so i figured you would add on .75 in.(because that is the width of the wood) to the teal. The port width is 1.75 in. wide (so half that) So i would do 10.25+.75+.875=11.875, but on the wedsite it says teh port length is actually 12 inches wrong. What did i do wrong to calculate the port length? Quote Baylor University Accounting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andym85 Posted January 11, 2007 Report Share Posted January 11, 2007 that is pretty close...11.875=11 7/8...so there is 1/8" of a difference, that aint gonna be noticable Quote i likes me some audio stuff... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.