emperorjj1 Posted October 16, 2006 Report Share Posted October 16, 2006 lol i know this is sorta odd to ask since but how much worse is the btl for sound quality then the q? ive herd the q has good sq but what about the btl? im looking to do streetbeat, dts 5.1, and sq comps Quote J. JMy CardomainFINISHED COBALT SS/SC DUAL ALTERNATOR PICS theres no such thing as too expensive when it comes to upgrades like that, because imo if you are gonna spend to upgrade then do it correctly rather then be a cheap ass ricer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MegaloManiac Posted October 21, 2006 Report Share Posted October 21, 2006 the ssd's have better SQ than both. BTL is for SPL I dont know about the Q Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emperorjj1 Posted October 21, 2006 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2006 ssd's? ya i just want to know how they sound... q is the fi version of the 05 xxx Quote J. JMy CardomainFINISHED COBALT SS/SC DUAL ALTERNATOR PICS theres no such thing as too expensive when it comes to upgrades like that, because imo if you are gonna spend to upgrade then do it correctly rather then be a cheap ass ricer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AI James Posted October 21, 2006 Report Share Posted October 21, 2006 ssd's? ya i just want to know how they sound... q is the fi version of the 05 xxx hell fucking no it isnt...more like a SX wannabe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emperorjj1 Posted October 21, 2006 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2006 really? thats just what i herd over the net... ive never really looked into re or we and their site is ghetto as hell so that dont get me no where Quote J. JMy CardomainFINISHED COBALT SS/SC DUAL ALTERNATOR PICS theres no such thing as too expensive when it comes to upgrades like that, because imo if you are gonna spend to upgrade then do it correctly rather then be a cheap ass ricer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AI James Posted October 21, 2006 Report Share Posted October 21, 2006 i'll keep my mouth shut on the Fi Q comparison to a 05 XXX because that to say the least the stupisist rumor. IDC what anyone form Fi tells you that sub does not sound near as good as the old XXX Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emperorjj1 Posted October 21, 2006 Author Report Share Posted October 21, 2006 no one from fi told me anything... but tell me wht you were gonna say... im dont want you to sugar coat it then i buy a bad woofer... :V hook it up with all the bad Quote J. JMy CardomainFINISHED COBALT SS/SC DUAL ALTERNATOR PICS theres no such thing as too expensive when it comes to upgrades like that, because imo if you are gonna spend to upgrade then do it correctly rather then be a cheap ass ricer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AI James Posted October 21, 2006 Report Share Posted October 21, 2006 niether are bad woofers, they just sound nothing alike so whoever said that was smoking crack Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MegaloManiac Posted October 21, 2006 Report Share Posted October 21, 2006 XXX does not compete with an Q. Fi doesnt have a sub out yet to compete with an XXX. If you want me to compare to REaudio here it is IMO. MT = BTL XXX = N/A MX = N/A SX = Q SE = SSD SR = X RE = N/A oh BTW the 05' xxx is IMO the 06' MX...but Fi hasnt came out with their own yet... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AI James Posted October 21, 2006 Report Share Posted October 21, 2006 pretty spot on except the last sentence, MX holds alot more power then the old XXX would have ever thought of, and sounds better doing it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.