Herokight Posted April 17, 2012 Report Posted April 17, 2012 I believe it experimentation time. My subs are SUPPOSEDLY optimized for sealed enclosures, and I'm running them in one right now. I want to build another box, and I got the torres calculator to mess around with. I'm running two 12" RF R1s at 150w. I know they probably won't do anything spectacular, but how does this look to ya'll as far as box design? I'm gonna upgrade later, but I believe it's better to experiment now instead of later when I get the really nice and shiny stuff. Lane AKA HeroKight '96 Jeep Cherokee Classic 4x4 R.I.P. Molliboo $200 for new tires, on a jeep!? Is she stealing them or building them with a heat gun and rubber bands? You hear that????That's a category 5 shit storm coming n8: hey you doing today. What's it like being a bitch? you can pm me if you'd like to explain why you arent one. Just like you did for your vs threads. ^^^Rules. Follow them.^^^
Joe X Posted April 17, 2012 Report Posted April 17, 2012 The port area per foot is usually set at 12 square inches per cubic foot minimum (necessary or not).
Herokight Posted April 17, 2012 Author Report Posted April 17, 2012 The port area per foot is usually set at 12 square inches per cubic foot minimum (necessary or not). Not quite sure if I'm getting what you're saying or not. I'm really new to designing ported boxes. Lane AKA HeroKight '96 Jeep Cherokee Classic 4x4 R.I.P. Molliboo $200 for new tires, on a jeep!? Is she stealing them or building them with a heat gun and rubber bands? You hear that????That's a category 5 shit storm coming n8: hey you doing today. What's it like being a bitch? you can pm me if you'd like to explain why you arent one. Just like you did for your vs threads. ^^^Rules. Follow them.^^^
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.