CleanSierra Posted August 18, 2013 Report Share Posted August 18, 2013 more port per foot. maybe add a half inch to port width, maybe less.... shoot for 14" per foot I don't think he needs more port for a single sub. 88" should be fine. Port per square foot isn't as important as total port area. You don't port to the airspace, you port to the sub and what it needs to perform. Im not the one you want to try to troll. Just a fyi for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brandonbkd Posted August 18, 2013 Author Report Share Posted August 18, 2013 What made his box suckWithout knowing that you may end up with same outcomeSide note if you want a low end tune why chose the bl and not the q Because I already have the BL. And the reason why the other box sucked is because the total port area was way too big. I thought I explained that in the OP FI BL18 Build Log: CLICK HERE!! 2003 Explorer Sport: FI BL18 SoundQubed 2200 at 0.7ohm Pioneer DEH-2500UI Pioneer 6 x 8s Rockford Fosgate 6 x 9s 5 ft^3 box at 35hz Lots of Mega Mat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john253a Posted August 19, 2013 Report Share Posted August 19, 2013 I ask because what you are saying was happening and what you are saying caused it is only a minute factor Bottoming out normally means your unloading Or overpower bellowing tunning Post what you had before Because its better to get it right now then build another box after this one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.