Namosh Posted October 15, 2008 Report Posted October 15, 2008 When running more than the recommended RMS in a ported box, would it be better to make the box bigger or smaller? For example....My subs are rated 600wrms and recommended ported box size is 2.25 - 3.25 cubic feet. I will be running three subs at around 900rms each so should I make the box closer to 6.75 or 9.75 cubic feet??? Or are there other considerations I need to know? My Ram Quad Cab Blow-through
audiofanaticz Posted October 15, 2008 Report Posted October 15, 2008 make your box smaller when your tossing more power to them from what I know.
audiofanaticz Posted October 15, 2008 Report Posted October 15, 2008 I know for fact that the bigger the box you put the sub in, the more efficient the sub will be with less power. So a 18" fi btl with 2000 wrms in a 8 cubed box will be louder then the same sub with the same power in a 6 cubed box.
alvitae Posted October 15, 2008 Report Posted October 15, 2008 My subs call for 2.5 ea. I have them in 1.6 each. My installer says thats one of the reasons they are still pounding away after the abuse I give them. I've done over peak watts for daily pounding with bass boost and gain on max. And long burp sessions.
Namosh Posted October 15, 2008 Author Report Posted October 15, 2008 OK....So, I can go with the minimum volume and not be cheating myself out of db's (with enough watts) I've got the room for it to be as big as I need....I'd just rather have it smaller for asthetic reasons. Thanks. My Ram Quad Cab Blow-through
raytard Posted October 15, 2008 Report Posted October 15, 2008 smaller box/port=more control=more power handling also a good idea to tune lower than most companies recommend, especially with larger subs, 29-32hz, because its reaaaaly easy to unload if you're throwing more power at then than rated. my subs are in a minimum reccomended size box with a very small (1.5x18x10) port, they see close to double rms for hours at a time with no problems. Build: http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/ind...hl=avalon+build monster/rockford/kicker/stinger cables, pioneer source, jbl highs/amps, kinetik/shuriken batts, iraggi alt, dei security, dc subs(atleast for now) Team DC
alvitae Posted October 15, 2008 Report Posted October 15, 2008 OK....So, I can go with the minimum volume and not be cheating myself out of db's (with enough watts)I've got the room for it to be as big as I need....I'd just rather have it smaller for asthetic reasons. Thanks. Imho yes. The amp I am using now is pushing only 425 watts to each 12, two of them. and with the subs in a 1.6 instead of a 2.5 I am hitting 142.1 on a tl. that could go up with some amp and deck settings tweaked i'm sure. So for me smaller is fine. Thats in the trunk by the way, firing forward with a slot port in the middle of a pre-fab so I don't know the tuning.
Namosh Posted October 15, 2008 Author Report Posted October 15, 2008 smaller box/port=more control=more power handlingalso a good idea to tune lower than most companies recommend, especially with larger subs, 29-32hz, because its reaaaaly easy to unload if you're throwing more power at then than rated. my subs are in a minimum reccomended size box with a very small (1.5x18x10) port, they see close to double rms for hours at a time with no problems. So, I've come up with close to the minimum box volume, tuned to around 29Hz with 92.5 square inch of port (I'm using the RE box calculator) Is this enough port for 3 15's? Seems like the velocity would be pretty high. My Ram Quad Cab Blow-through
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.