High sq 6x9?

[Antonio Moore]

I'm currently running RF t1 6x9 they're loud and clear but I have a lot more power (200rms) I could be using

Just want some suggestion on really good 6x9 not looking for much bass from these.

I'm aware that I could add 2 more sets of speakers but I would have to modify I don't want to modify so yeah.

Current set up

T600-4

T2 6.5 comps

T1693 6x9

All Rockford fosgate

[8ight]

SQ+6x9=what

[StoneCold455]

Haven't actually heard them, but the alpine type-r 6x9's are supposed to be good. the current model

[Antonio Moore]

SQ+6x9=what

Not sure what 6x9s u heard mine are clear and clean with my set up bass turned down it can get crappy if not tuned right

[RooTxBeeR]

SQ Doesn't revolve around a lot more power. The more you push a driver, the more chance it will have distortion.There's no chance you can replace your 6x9's with a 6.5?

[8ight]

The shape of a 6x9s cone doesn't exactly lend itself to high-fidelity performance. I would get some 6x9 to 6.5 adapters and put some nice components in their place. What I consider "clear" and what I consider "quality" are very different things, my cars mids/highs are loud as shit and can't sound good (to me) because of that alone but that's what I need for the stupid amount of bass I'll be soon to have.

[Antonio Moore]

SQ Doesn't revolve around a lot more power. The more you push a driver, the more chance it will have distortion.There's no chance you can replace your 6x9's with a 6.5?

Hmm I don't think so they're a little too round sounds like a good idea though maybe I could make a few changes 6.5 would sound a lot better..

[Antonio Moore]

The shape of a 6x9s cone doesn't exactly lend itself to high-fidelity performance. I would get some 6x9 to 6.5 adapters and put some nice components in their place. What I consider "clear" and what I consider "quality" are very different things, my cars mids/highs are loud as shit and can't sound good (to me) because of that alone but that's what I need for the stupid amount of bass I'll be soon to have.

Ya sounds good I have comps in my front " RF t2" sounds great I could very well be confusing the sq from my comps over the 6x9s? Who knows but adaptor is good idea

[8ight]

The shape of a 6x9s cone doesn't exactly lend itself to high-fidelity performance. I would get some 6x9 to 6.5 adapters and put some nice components in their place. What I consider "clear" and what I consider "quality" are very different things, my cars mids/highs are loud as shit and can't sound good (to me) because of that alone but that's what I need for the stupid amount of bass I'll be soon to have.

Ya sounds good I have comps in my front " RF t2" sounds great I could very well be confusing the sq from my comps over the 6x9s? Who knows but adaptor is good idea

I'm sure the 6x9s don't sound bad or anything I have just always favored 6.5s or anything round for that matter, I've had better luck with getting good sound out of them without much tweaking.

EDIT: Speakers will blend, get some great sounding speakers and some not so good sounding ones and play them together for a slightly louder setup with sound quality somewhere in between what the two sets are capable of. Again, I highly doubt your 6x9s sound BAD I really enjoy the sound signature Rockford speakers have.

[bcbrassard]

Are you running the T1692s or T1693s? i hace a pair of the T1692s in my son Tahoe getting about 108 watts RMS of a RF P500-4 and they are plenty loud with a fair amount of Mid Bass. you would have to look at Candence, i think they have like a 300 watt 2 or 3 way set up. just uncommonto get much higher power from 6x9s. I think RF are some of the highest. they have huge magnets thats for sure. Where are your located?

Most peopl run 6.5 in there place, hell you could put a 8" pro driver in there with some minor mods. RF Punch Pro 8" for loudness but there not SQ speakers, ment for SPL.