arrhythmia jeep Posted June 20, 2014 Author Report Posted June 20, 2014 well you have given me some stuff to think about and thoroughly fucked up my plan but that is what i asked for so thank you gentlemen 1997 zj jeep
arrhythmia jeep Posted June 20, 2014 Author Report Posted June 20, 2014 thing is i have all these 33 x 29 panels now with no usefulness 1997 zj jeep
Joe X Posted June 20, 2014 Report Posted June 20, 2014 well you have given me some stuff to think about and thoroughly fucked up my plan but that is what i asked for so thank you gentlemen Got space so then get more subs... and never forget to look inside the shipping box for a manual... easy way to avoid forum "issues".
arrhythmia jeep Posted June 20, 2014 Author Report Posted June 20, 2014 using winisd it looks like it will die at 27 hz which sucks because i have some songs that play down there and plan to play some in the future 1997 zj jeep
FocusOn20s Posted June 20, 2014 Report Posted June 20, 2014 homie killed me with the 2. dem lows DEAD
Joe X Posted June 20, 2014 Report Posted June 20, 2014 using winisd it looks like it will die at 27 hz which sucks because i have some songs that play down there and plan to play some in the future That's why you don't use winISD for predicting response inside a car, a car is not an anechoic chamber. Read a little on cabin gain.
arrhythmia jeep Posted June 21, 2014 Author Report Posted June 21, 2014 ok so i revised the plan taking into consideration the comments and sperience you all have given me and here is the new specs box : 16 h x 33 w x 29 d port : 14.5 h x 3 w x 40 l tuned acording to torres @ 21.4 before sub and fiberglass innards now has 1 to 4.8 port ratio and not 4 but 5.3 cuft net so can i go build this now ??? 1997 zj jeep
CleanSierra Posted June 21, 2014 Report Posted June 21, 2014 Let er rip. Hope you have one HELLLLLL of mid stage because tuning that low in a vehicle is pure stupid. Tune it where manufacturer said to, in the low to mid 30s. It's a car audio sub, you're modeling it in a program for use in the home, hence the low tune suggestion(for the low thump of explosions and helicopter blade thwop). A vehicle is not a room, you don't need to tune that low to get the response. Too much airspace, too low of a tune. You'll get a sub that falls on its face when it comes to music you want to hear. My response is to your original 10 cubic foot box idea, not your revision. Im not the one you want to try to troll. Just a fyi for you.
arrhythmia jeep Posted June 21, 2014 Author Report Posted June 21, 2014 Let er rip. Hope you have one HELLLLLL of mid stage because tuning that low in a vehicle is pure stupid. Tune it where manufacturer said to, in the low to mid 30s. It's a car audio sub, you're modeling it in a program for use in the home, hence the low tune suggestion(for the low thump of explosions and helicopter blade thwop). A vehicle is not a room, you don't need to tune that low to get the response. Too much airspace, too low of a tune. You'll get a sub that falls on its face when it comes to music you want to hear. My response is to your original 10 cubic foot box idea, not your revision. so what youre saying is i can tune it to 33 hz and still play 25 hz without damage ? 1997 zj jeep
gckless Posted June 21, 2014 Report Posted June 21, 2014 Yeah why dafuq are you tuning to 21Hz with that sub? Tune no lower than 28ish. Also, have you taken into account upper end response? I don't get this "I love da lowzzzzzz" trend. It's getting worse and worse. People are going to be tuning in the teens pretty soon. Rediculous. "Clipping" is the biggest forum boner now. It's like witchcraft... it automatically explains just about everything people don't understand. My build log: http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/200295-gckless-2011-chevrolet-impala/ High resolution photos: Gilbert Kless Photography
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.