ChevyBoy Posted December 8, 2006 Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 He only hit a 149spl with 6 of them????bassrace Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DVBin916 Posted December 8, 2006 Author Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 He only hit a 149spl with 6 of them????bassrace Copy that. So disdatchevyboy! if you had the choice of the following which would you go with? Treo SSIs for 4 of them for $1,000. or Fi Q's for 4 $1116.00 ??? - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChevyBoy Posted December 8, 2006 Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 do you want better sq or spl? the q is made for sq. so keep that in mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DVBin916 Posted December 8, 2006 Author Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 I am looking to increase my SPL. Keep in mind I will be up grading my amps as well. - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChevyBoy Posted December 8, 2006 Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 prolly the treos for all out spl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DVBin916 Posted December 8, 2006 Author Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 ok so witch of the following. the 4 2ohm BTL 15" 2000W RMS W/3rd Magnet will cost me $1636.00 or the Treo SSIs for 4 of them for $1,000?? - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AI James Posted December 8, 2006 Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 Id get the Q's and i'll tell you why since this isnt his for sale post i can bash all i want. Id pay the extra for 4 subs that are brand new that some kid hasn't been beating on. Fi's if you have any problems whatsoever Scott will be there to help you out in your time of need. The Treos have been used, i wont say abused because i dont know gmonks listening habits, but i will say thati have heard both and i'd take a Q over a SSi anyday. If they were SSX they would blow away the others in SQ and be up there in loudness. its worth the 116 for the new Q's over the used Treos believe me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DVBin916 Posted December 8, 2006 Author Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 Id get the Q's and i'll tell you why since this isnt his for sale post i can bash all i want. Id pay the extra for 4 subs that are brand new that some kid hasn't been beating on. Fi's if you have any problems whatsoever Scott will be there to help you out in your time of need. The Treos have been used, i wont say abused because i dont know gmonks listening habits, but i will say thati have heard both and i'd take a Q over a SSi anyday. If they were SSX they would blow away the others in SQ and be up there in loudness. its worth the 116 for the new Q's over the used Treos believe me. Thanks for the input "Accord" But would you spend the extra $500.00 on the BTL's ???? - Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AI James Posted December 8, 2006 Report Share Posted December 8, 2006 ifi had the money to do so Amps Batterys Wiring runs Alternators yea i would, just have to realive it takes alot more money to power the BTLs then Qs Lets say you get RF T2ks 2Q''s on 1 amp 1 BTl per amp you can see it stacking up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
emperorjj1 Posted December 9, 2006 Report Share Posted December 9, 2006 right and just to let you know if you get the btl you should go fully loaded... the 3rd mag doesnt do much without the himax... the himax without the third mag can may over exurt past the 2nd mag, the cooling is pretty much nessicary bc without it theres no point in 3rd mag and himax J. JMy CardomainFINISHED COBALT SS/SC DUAL ALTERNATOR PICS theres no such thing as too expensive when it comes to upgrades like that, because imo if you are gonna spend to upgrade then do it correctly rather then be a cheap ass ricer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.