jonatan Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 has anyone heard of the Audison Bit One signal interface processor or has used one i would like some input on it if anyone know or how it compares to a 3sixty Kenwood Excelon DDX812 6.95" double din 4 lvl 4 xl 15" 4 RF 1500 2 RF 600.4 2 15-MC5 - Memphis 5.25" 2 Way MClass Coaxial Speakers 2 15-MC92 - Memphis 6 x 9" 2 Way MClass Coaxial Speakers 2 mc memphis tweeters memphis 16-EQP4 Signal Processors 4 2400 Kinetik 1 1800 Kinetik iraggi 300 http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/ind...showtopic=42009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stephen Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 talk to ray on here , thats his username you can cook bacon shirtless if you're not a pussy...lol not hatin, but am i wrong here it looks as if the amp is not grounded its hooked directly to the battery. it that the way it should be. DC POWER Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbondox Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 along the same lines as the 3sixty.2, but non bluetooth. has extra inputs and a wired controller. doing an install with one this past weekend. comes with a tosilink input which in my opinion is where it leaves the RF piece... not to mention the build quality between the 2 is night and day SMD SuperSeller VerifiedJbondoXJames Shields Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neel Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 I just sold my 3sixty.2 to buy a bit one, the bit one is just a beast compared to the 3sixty.2. Although there are alot of people running them that have issues with noise, once they get the issues fixed they are very happy. I plan on running a drz-9255 with an optical out straight to the bit one. Only other processor i was considering was the zapco DSP6. What do you plan on using the bit one for? Too Much Stuff to list . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Posted June 22, 2009 Report Share Posted June 22, 2009 There are no more noise issues that I know of. Toslink 31 bands on each ch time alignment on each ch digital out an audison piece. 2008 California state record holder 157.2 Bassrace2009 California state record holder 157.0 BassraceRollin 50's 158.7db2009 King of Cali Bassrace2009 USACi score 160.5 @ 42hz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonatan Posted June 24, 2009 Author Report Share Posted June 24, 2009 I just sold my 3sixty.2 to buy a bit one, the bit one is just a beast compared to the 3sixty.2. Although there are alot of people running them that have issues with noise, once they get the issues fixed they are very happy. I plan on running a drz-9255 with an optical out straight to the bit one. Only other processor i was considering was the zapco DSP6. What do you plan on using the bit one for? I plan on adding 5 sets of components to my two rf 600.4's and also have 4 rf 1500's would you guys say a bit one is a good choice for what I have Kenwood Excelon DDX812 6.95" double din 4 lvl 4 xl 15" 4 RF 1500 2 RF 600.4 2 15-MC5 - Memphis 5.25" 2 Way MClass Coaxial Speakers 2 15-MC92 - Memphis 6 x 9" 2 Way MClass Coaxial Speakers 2 mc memphis tweeters memphis 16-EQP4 Signal Processors 4 2400 Kinetik 1 1800 Kinetik iraggi 300 http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/ind...showtopic=42009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbondox Posted June 24, 2009 Report Share Posted June 24, 2009 I plan on adding 5 sets of components to my two rf 600.4's and also have 4 rf 1500's would you guys say a bit one is a good choice for what I have well bit one had some noise issues when it came out, hardware and something else, 360.2 is pretty solid unit so far, I like both, but the build quality of the audison piece is 100x nicer... I talked to one of the audison reps last week and they stated it was pretty much problem free SMD SuperSeller VerifiedJbondoXJames Shields Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.