doug118 Posted July 13, 2009 Report Posted July 13, 2009 decisions. what do you guys think design #1 or design #2 how big of a difference would these 2 be decibel wise? like a direct swap from 1 to the other? and which one do you think would sound better for music? edit: almost forgot, thanks footlongsam for the 2 designs plans for setup are as follows 2 12" dc level 4xl's 1 3000-4000 watt amp. whichever I can get when ready to purchase, either sundown 3000, rf t4000.1, or american bass vfl 400.1 3 batteries 200amp alt this is all going into a 2dr honda civic, subs and port forward sealed off from the trunk 2001 Tahoe. Huge front stage and 55+ substage http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/196418-another-tahoe-build-huge-front-stage-and-155-substage/
Jasonbc Posted July 13, 2009 Report Posted July 13, 2009 facing forward..if you have the port to the driver side it would do slightly better at the dbdrags with the port at the opposite side as the mic. with the port on the pass. side it would be louder at the drivers seat. port in the middle would be a compromise of the other locations. depends if you want to get that last db at the drags.
jhmeg2 Posted July 14, 2009 Report Posted July 14, 2009 good looking designs. tuff call. I think that design 1 the subs would load better and creat more pressure, but design 2 the subs would be better matched and less cancelation. but I could be wrong. I depends on what you want.. loud or good sound ////Alpine, Eclipse, Load Boss, Pheonix Gold, MB Quart,Digital Desings, Memphis, Stinger, Periphial, MTX, Visualogic
hotshot27 Posted July 14, 2009 Report Posted July 14, 2009 i say designs two one- i like the cosmetic look of it two- i think the bracing will be stronger in the smaller area chambers Current Setup: Factory HU with LOC mids/highs-Insignia components Sub- E8 in bass tube Amp- sae-1200d Show Setup: HU-Sony MEX-1HD (brings massive respect for sony) fronts - Infinity Kappa perfect comps rears- Infinity Kappa coax mid/high amp - Autotek 5600 Subs - 2 RE SE 15's Sub Amps - 2xSAE-1200D Box - 5cubes sealed Wire- Lots of Knu 1/0 SECOND SKIN
loburbon Posted July 14, 2009 Report Posted July 14, 2009 imo design number two. but the only way to tell is build and test 2000 gmc yukon 4 sundown Zv3 15's 4 dd m2a's kenwood kdc-x994 2 batcap 4000's 1 batcap 2000 dual alts. 154@37hz and climbing http://www.cardomain.com/ride/3231683 http://www.myspace.com/torque150
Decaf Posted July 14, 2009 Report Posted July 14, 2009 #2 like i said... looks like i dont have to do that design for ya then... thanks footlong
doug118 Posted July 14, 2009 Author Report Posted July 14, 2009 I was leaning more towards number 2 so that helped that most said #2. depending on how much I can score some mdf for and how well the box gets built, I may build #1 shortly after and see which one sounds better to the ear. sound is top priority, I'm sure the numbers will be decent either way 2001 Tahoe. Huge front stage and 55+ substage http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/196418-another-tahoe-build-huge-front-stage-and-155-substage/
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.