Your saying that means you missed the point of my post, and so did jon as it seems.
oh well, ill carry on misunderstood and y'all carry on selling stuff that doesn't do a bit of good for half the target audience of this forum. Note the gfaphs had huge spikes down low, where most of us want deadening to begin with.
so what exactly was ur point then? seeing this i don't see how anyone could argue that peel and seal is worth a damn... yes it does "something" as the test shows but most importantly its not even cheaper when u look at the actual results. comparing 200% vs 25% to halfway equal what does that show people with 4 layers or whatever? looking at the graphs from 100% to 200% you can see where diminishing results kicks in and it does little at some points. at least i think i can (jon can u make a graph to show 100% vs the double layer?)