Joe X Posted April 11, 2012 Report Share Posted April 11, 2012 Why woild you want to build that, also hope it was designed speciffically for those subs. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joeym4692 Posted April 11, 2012 Report Share Posted April 11, 2012 sorry for the random?? but what program do you use to make designs like that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe X Posted April 11, 2012 Report Share Posted April 11, 2012 it's a dual reflex bandpass (6th order). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrEwubbsZ Posted April 11, 2012 Report Share Posted April 11, 2012 it has to be inventor i use the same one. Quote 2000 Ranger Build Log Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fosgatefeind Posted April 11, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 11, 2012 Yes 6th order. Basically my questtion is will it work.or no Quote Buildlog: http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/146515-2007-monte-carlo-ls-build-new-plans-with-dc-audio/ TEAM DC AUDIO www.Dcsoundlab.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe X Posted April 12, 2012 Report Share Posted April 12, 2012 You need know the net volume of each chamber and the length, the port cross-sectional area, and the t/s parameters of the sub to determine it's behaviour..BUT modelling software assumes constant cross-sectional area ports to determine tuning of each chamber and it's not the case with this design.. so you should ask the designer in any case, generally 6th order enclosure sound very loud but quality is bad, usually lots of group delay around the tuning frequencies. I wouldn't build something like that unless I knew for a fact that it will work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fosgatefeind Posted April 12, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 12, 2012 (edited) You need know the net volume of each chamber and the length, the port cross-sectional area, and the t/s parameters of the sub to determine it's behaviour..BUT modelling software assumes constant cross-sectional area ports to determine tuning of each chamber and it's not the case with this design.. so you should ask the designer in any case, generally 6th order enclosure sound very loud but quality is bad, usually lots of group delay around the tuning frequencies. I wouldn't build something like that unless I knew for a fact that it will work. I have no idea what you just said. I have never tried to design a box the right way. I was in class in designed this and thounght if I posted it here I could find out if it works Edited April 12, 2012 by FosgateFeind Quote Buildlog: http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/146515-2007-monte-carlo-ls-build-new-plans-with-dc-audio/ TEAM DC AUDIO www.Dcsoundlab.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fosgatefeind Posted April 12, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 12, 2012 http://www.dcsoundlab.com/xl.html Sub specs I found Idk if you need more info Quote Buildlog: http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/146515-2007-monte-carlo-ls-build-new-plans-with-dc-audio/ TEAM DC AUDIO www.Dcsoundlab.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CJ18 Posted April 12, 2012 Report Share Posted April 12, 2012 If you are having to ask us if it will work then I am going to say no dont bother. Stick with a traditional ported box. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fosgatefeind Posted April 12, 2012 Author Report Share Posted April 12, 2012 If it doesn't work what do I need to chsnge Quote Buildlog: http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/146515-2007-monte-carlo-ls-build-new-plans-with-dc-audio/ TEAM DC AUDIO www.Dcsoundlab.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.