EricR Posted May 3, 2008 Report Posted May 3, 2008 vidz Quote i was thinking leave the 12 sitting in the box in the hole and duck tape from the bottom of the sub to the bottom of the baffle so the sub doesnt free air. would that work?
DDSPL-I AM A SCAMMER Posted May 5, 2008 Report Posted May 5, 2008 not to knock this thread, be negative, say dc subs suck, or start an argument in any way.... but if you put more power to both subs... check the numbers then... all u did was put the max power to the dc and a little more than half to the dd. sure dc is a good sub, but when comparing to dd u need to add more power to optimize results Quote
BigPimpin91 Posted May 5, 2008 Report Posted May 5, 2008 I do believe 3,850w is more than the R.M.S of the DC. Not specialized in the DD area. Quote BigPimpin91's Banging Music
DDSPL-I AM A SCAMMER Posted May 5, 2008 Report Posted May 5, 2008 I do believe 3,850w is more than the R.M.S of the DC. Not specialized in the DD area. 3850 is ideal for a 9515 daily Quote
Bryan Posted May 5, 2008 Report Posted May 5, 2008 3850 is ideal for a 9515 dailyso basically it took tripple the rms of a dc sub to match the stated rms of the DD i wonder what the score would be if the dd's rms was trippled hell even doubled Quote MMM BASS OATS..ITS WHAT I HAVE FOR BREAKFAST 2 AudioQue HDC3 18'' subs Rockford Fosgate T1 6.5 mids MMATS 2000.05 XS Power D1200 Knukonceptz 1/0 Pioneer Premier DEH-P490iB " Shit I can roll a blunt better than those bitches in Havana!"- Uncle Elroy
BigPimpin91 Posted May 5, 2008 Report Posted May 5, 2008 3850 is ideal for a 9515 dailyI meant I was unspecialized in DD. Quote BigPimpin91's Banging Music
DDSPL-I AM A SCAMMER Posted May 5, 2008 Report Posted May 5, 2008 so basically it took tripple the rms of a dc sub to match the stated rms of the DD i wonder what the score would be if the dd's rms was trippled hell even doubled well i was putting it in a nicer fashion... but yes. I meant I was unspecialized in DD. i know, i was filling you in Quote
WCA Rusty Posted May 5, 2008 Author Report Posted May 5, 2008 (edited) Im sure with triple that amount of power The LV4 would be a very unhappy woofer,and the 9500 would put a bigger gap between them. I only stated what the results were at that power level 3850 watts , The 9500 is alot bigger sub that is capable of taking alot more power, never said it wouldent For a test with more power a LV4XL would be a more suitable woofer to compare, there about the same size and power handeling but a 9500 and LV4 is all I had at the tie, I tested them and posted the results, nothing more Edited May 5, 2008 by WCA Rusty Quote DC AUDIO Phone Number 1(855)SPL-DBZZ Built by Competitors, for Competitors.
audiofanaticz Posted May 5, 2008 Report Posted May 5, 2008 Im sure with triple that amount of power The LV4 would be a very unhappy woofer,and the 9500 would put a bigger gap between them. I only stated what the results were at that power level 3850 watts , The 9500 is alot bigger sub that is capable of taking alot more power, never said it wouldent For a test with more power a LV4XL would be a more suitable woofer to compare, there about the same size and power handeling but a 9500 and LV4 is all I had at the tie, I tested them and posted the results, nothing more Dont want things to be took the wrong way again rusty, but you said the lvl 4 was just a couple tenths behind the dd, did you use the same power for that test as above for both subs? If so do you think that the DD sub would of performed better with more power then what was used and end up being a little louder? Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.