faralint Posted June 7, 2014 Author Report Posted June 7, 2014 Thanks to all! Want to try 8" port. And 10" but shorter Build log - http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/173832-audi-a6-trunk-build/page-3
faralint Posted June 20, 2014 Author Report Posted June 20, 2014 Build log - http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/173832-audi-a6-trunk-build/page-3
faralint Posted June 26, 2014 Author Report Posted June 26, 2014 this what i think to test. and seal off with foam. but don't know can this give me some gain or not Build log - http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/173832-audi-a6-trunk-build/page-3
CleanSierra Posted July 12, 2014 Report Posted July 12, 2014 I would take THIS route, before thinking about a bandpass box. The bandpass it's going to be pretty large and I think this design has the ability to be much louder. Im not the one you want to try to troll. Just a fyi for you.
OrionStang Posted July 13, 2014 Report Posted July 13, 2014 Did not realize the A6 trunk was that big. Damn. I suggest against a 4th order, not with XL's. SMD Super Seller My Feedback Thread
zrkie Posted August 24, 2014 Report Posted August 24, 2014 Love hte build plus the rear port. Tho when expanding in the way you modelled it, you'll effectively not only thunnel the airflow but also potentially mess with the tuning of the box. Have you clamped and invesitgated where you've the actual tuning today? Other than that, I really dig this. Inspriational to see some success in the light of my own trunk failure (140 at 27hz) cheers Don't like sharing your knowledge? Welll.. Don't come here and grab others then! - GTFO.
faralint Posted October 6, 2014 Author Report Posted October 6, 2014 I would take THIS route, before thinking about a bandpass box. The bandpass it's going to be pretty large and I think this design has the ability to be much louder. Try this route. and take it off. lost 1db with that... Build log - http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/173832-audi-a6-trunk-build/page-3
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.