Jump to content
Sundown Audio

What Amp Would Be Best For An...


nathan89

Recommended Posts

not really a cheater amp. but rf is cea-2006 compliant. read up on it.

so is alpine,kicker,mtx ect...but they are not underrated,not as much as RF anyway.

smd2.gif

2002 nissan frontier crewcab

eclipse cd2000

mb quart prem's fr&rear

rf p4004

Link to comment
Share on other sites

kicker and mtx have and can be over rated as much as rf.

hmm..i've been doing this for about 16 years and i have never seen kicker or

mtx 500 watts underrated.maybe some of kickers older stuff.but thats just me.

Edited by jasonw30

smd2.gif

2002 nissan frontier crewcab

eclipse cd2000

mb quart prem's fr&rear

rf p4004

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the higher the efficiency, the better.

The T800.2 I was looking at had an efficiency rating of 48%

Does the lower efficiency mean it does not put out as much power as it says it does, or does it mean it takes more power from the battery/alternator to run it??

Please, somebody clue me in because this is what I am going to make my decision on between the T800.2 and the T1500.1bd

By the way, if I remeber right, the spec sheet I looked at for the T1500.1bd said it had 81% efficiency.

Sorry for all the questions guys, but I want to get the best amp I can this time. You help is GREATLY appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dude!!!! If I wansnt in the progress of moving I could show yo the birth sheet of one of my T3000's with a rating of 3600 watts! Yeah a t3000 with a 3600watt rating :)

Some people need a sympathetic pat... on the head...with my hammer

Scientia est Vox

"In Nomine Patris et Filii et Spiritus Sancti"clover.gif

DONT BE AFRAID TO USE THE SEARCH BUTTON!!!

SMD SUPER BUYER/SELLER

Roscoe.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The T800.2 I was looking at had an efficiency rating of 48%

Does the lower efficiency mean it does not put out as much power as it says it does, or does it mean it takes more power from the battery/alternator to run it??

Please, somebody clue me in because this is what I am going to make my decision on between the T800.2 and the T1500.1bd

By the way, if I remeber right, the spec sheet I looked at for the T1500.1bd said it had 81% efficiency.

Sorry for all the questions guys, but I want to get the best amp I can this time. You help is GREATLY appreciated.

the reason tha T800.2 is 48% eff is because its a 2 channel amp.monoblocks are alot

more eff.also,the lower eff means more of a strain on the bat/alt.more wasted power.

it just takes more power to produce more power.

Edited by jasonw30

smd2.gif

2002 nissan frontier crewcab

eclipse cd2000

mb quart prem's fr&rear

rf p4004

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Who's Online   1 Member, 0 Anonymous, 516 Guests (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...