Jump to content
Second Skin Audio

Having a hard time with this box..


Recommended Posts

Posted

Either way, they don't act the same way.

The excursions, the impedance graphs, along with other factors don't act the same in any sorts.

b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png

Krakin's Home Dipole Project

http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/186153-krakins-dipole-project-new-reciever-in-rockford-science/#entry2772370

Krakin, are you some sort of mad scientist?

I would have replied earlier, but I was measuring the output of my amp with a yardstick . . .

What you hear is not the air pressure variation in itself

but what has drawn your attention

in the two streams of superimposed air pressure variations at your eardrums

An acoustic event has dimensions of Time, Tone, Loudness and Space

Everyone learns to render the 3-dimensional localization of sound based on the individual shape of their ears,

thus no formula can achieve a definite effect for every listener.

Posted

The loudspeaker design cookbook, any of Richard Small's or A. N. Thiele's JAES papers, here, anything published by JBL or Klipsch, Siegfried Linkwitz, http://www.subwoofer-builder.com/index.htm, and possibly the best for beginners,

http://bcae1.com/

That should keep you entertained for a long time, lol.

b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png

Krakin's Home Dipole Project

http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/186153-krakins-dipole-project-new-reciever-in-rockford-science/#entry2772370

Krakin, are you some sort of mad scientist?

I would have replied earlier, but I was measuring the output of my amp with a yardstick . . .

What you hear is not the air pressure variation in itself

but what has drawn your attention

in the two streams of superimposed air pressure variations at your eardrums

An acoustic event has dimensions of Time, Tone, Loudness and Space

Everyone learns to render the 3-dimensional localization of sound based on the individual shape of their ears,

thus no formula can achieve a definite effect for every listener.

Posted

The loudspeaker design cookbook, any of Richard Small's or A. N. Thiele's JAES papers, here, anything published by JBL or Klipsch, Siegfried Linkwitz, http://www.subwoofer-builder.com/index.htm, and possibly the best for beginners,

http://bcae1.com/

That should keep you entertained for a long time, lol.

Sweet lol. I get bored when I'm not doing homeowork or working, so I need stuff to read. Does 54 in^2 of port sound alright for the x's? Tuned to ~34hz according to Torres

Posted

Either way, they don't act the same way.

The excursions, the impedance graphs, along with other factors don't act the same in any sorts.

I can't prove it but just stated what I've heard. The way I see it is that if the port is to large you won't have the cone control you should have. That would take a rather huge port for the majority of subs members use on here though.

to large of a port from what I've read as well is that it can create a more peaky response but that to small can cause port noise or the lack of band width.

just stuff I've heard/read with no testing that I could see behind it.

imo just shoot for what the sub you have asks for and don't go to far below or above it unless trying to see what the limits of port area are for that sub/install.

t1500bdcp

2 t2d4 15"

1 t600.4

1 t400.2

1 set p1 tweets

singer alt, tons of wiring, smd vm-1, 80prs, back seat delete, still in the works, aiming for a 145-147 with the ability to play 25hz up to 50hz.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 3203 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
×
×
  • Create New...