Jump to content

Tweeter impedance problem


Terra Rysing

Recommended Posts

Posted

I got a kenwood 6.5" component set which has a inline passive crossover going to the tweeters. When I measure the tweeter's impedance its 4.1 ohms. Then when connected with the passive its 0.5 ohms. WTF.

Posted

Sounds normal, since you aren't measuring just the tweeter after it's connected. Where are you measuring after it's connected?

"Clipping" is the biggest forum boner now. It's like witchcraft... it automatically explains just about everything people don't understand.

My build log: http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/200295-gckless-2011-chevrolet-impala/

High resolution photos: Gilbert Kless Photography

Posted

There are other components that could lower the overall resistance inside the crossover. I've never cared to measure mine, but I can on Tuesday when I get home.

b_350_20_692108_381007_FFFFFF_000000.png

Krakin's Home Dipole Project

http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/186153-krakins-dipole-project-new-reciever-in-rockford-science/#entry2772370

Krakin, are you some sort of mad scientist?

I would have replied earlier, but I was measuring the output of my amp with a yardstick . . .

What you hear is not the air pressure variation in itself

but what has drawn your attention

in the two streams of superimposed air pressure variations at your eardrums

An acoustic event has dimensions of Time, Tone, Loudness and Space

Everyone learns to render the 3-dimensional localization of sound based on the individual shape of their ears,

thus no formula can achieve a definite effect for every listener.

Posted

I first thought my tweeter protection was kicking in but the tweets and my 6.5's both quit playing. So I thought my amp may be going into protect, that's why I got out the ohm meter. I have them wired in parallel so I should have a 2 ohm load at my amp per each channel.

Posted

Impedance cannot be measured by an ordinary DMM or VOM. Impedance is an AC measurement that varies with frequency and is at it's highest at the resonant frequency of the driver. Resistance is a DC measurement.

A 4Ω tweet connected in parallel with a 4Ω mid-woofer thru the passive X-over does not make a 2Ω load. Thanks to the X-over the tweet presents a 4Ω load to frequencies above the X-over point and the mid-woofer presents a 4Ω load to frequencies below the X-over point. Combined they make an overall 4Ω load.

2011 Chevy Silverado LT 5.3L 4x4 Ext.-cab

"Enjoy yourself. It's later than you think."

Posted

Impedance cannot be measured by an ordinary DMM or VOM. Impedance is an AC measurement that varies with frequency and is at it's highest at the resonant frequency of the driver. Resistance is a DC measurement.

A 4Ω tweet connected in parallel with a 4Ω mid-woofer thru the passive X-over does not make a 2Ω load. Thanks to the X-over the tweet presents a 4Ω load to frequencies above the X-over point and the mid-woofer presents a 4Ω load to frequencies below the X-over point. Combined they make an overall 4Ω load.

Dude nice. I didn't expect anyone to post this.

This is correct. Impedance is not the same as DC resistance. Most likely what you were measuring was an inductor in the crossover.

Posted

No, the inductance of the woofer’s voice coil acts like a LPF at the speaker’s upper frequency response limit. You can see this in the manufacturer's frequency response curve. A typical 6.5” mid-woofer when run full-range will have a natural roll off in it’s upper response around 4kHz to 6kHz or so.

If the lower limit of the tweet is say 2kHz you will have an area in the two response curves that overlap from 2kHz to around 4kHz. This small overlap area will have a lower impedance at or around 2Ω but the nominal impedance of the two combined drivers will still be 4Ω providing that both the tweet and mid are both 4Ω.

2011 Chevy Silverado LT 5.3L 4x4 Ext.-cab

"Enjoy yourself. It's later than you think."

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 873 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
×
×
  • Create New...