Jump to content
Second Skin Audio

Series tuned 6th order bandpass experiment


Recommended Posts

I would very much appreciate if you posted input parameters for those, I have tried the parallel tuned version in Hornresp and while I didn't manage to get that perfectly flat top I think is close enough to confirm that changing the rear chamber tuning does not alter the port loading frequency of the front chamber (as before). Would it be fair to say you overlooked these results before making your test box?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No prob, here are the parallel and series tuned Hornresp inputs:

GZtpxUP.jpg

Um2mmAe.jpg

I'm not sure if I follow you as to which results I may have been overlooking before I built the box.

I don't expect the tuning of one chamber to affect to other with a parallel tuned box so I didn't do any testing with a parallel tuned system. Earlier I think I misunderstood you when you were posting the results of the parallel tuned box with different rear chamber tunings. I was thinking that was a series tuned box for some reason.

"Nothing prevents people from knowing the truth more than the belief they already know it."
"Making bass is easy, making music is the hard part."

Builds:

U7qkMTL.jpg  LgPgE9w.jpg  Od2G3u1.jpg  xMyLoO1.jpg  9pAlXUK.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for that (the series one needed the latest version of the software), no big deal, is just that it would seem to me like you found out that the loading frequencies were "linked" as you put it during measurements rather during the modeling that took place before building the box, again completely unimportant since it doesn't matter where you find out as long as you do, I guess there are many other useful measurements that can be done with it, here is the same comparison that you posted before through BBP:

Red: Series tuned 6th BP, Rear 3 net @ 24Hz, Front 2.4net @ 54Hz.

Yellow: Parallel tuned 6th BP, Rear 3 net @ 34Hz, Front 2.4net @ 54Hz.

par_vs_ser.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, I follow you now. I did know that Hornresp was showing that the chamber tuning frequencies were linked before I built the box, I was just hoping that Hornresp was wrong :-)

I guess I should have know better since Hornresp has been very well developed, but my hope got the better of me.

The good news coming out of all of this is at least I know I can trust what Hornresp tells me.

"Nothing prevents people from knowing the truth more than the belief they already know it."
"Making bass is easy, making music is the hard part."

Builds:

U7qkMTL.jpg  LgPgE9w.jpg  Od2G3u1.jpg  xMyLoO1.jpg  9pAlXUK.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mmmmmm love me some 6th order knowledge. Ive always believed that in a 6th order series the inner chamber does effect the outer chambers tuning and vice versa. I have always just used paper and pencil when trying to do some rough designs for 6th orders, the formula i used for tuning incorporated both port lengths and port area in order to properly design. i really need/want to download a proper design program so i can input woofer parameters and really get s better view of potential outcomes.

Fidelity

Built to Last

Team Sound Asleep

24Runner Build Log: http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/196657-24runner-sleeper-system-lots-of-fi-neo-dd-focal-new-video-w-juicebox-lithium/

2 x 12" Fi BTL N2 / 2 x 12" Fi BTL N3

2 DD M3b

Maxwell 2.7V 3000F Supercapacitors

Pioneer DEH-80prs

Focal P165 V30 components

Rockford Fosgate T-400.4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mmmmmm love me some 6th order knowledge. Ive always believed that in a 6th order series the inner chamber does effect the outer chambers tuning and vice versa. I have always just used paper and pencil when trying to do some rough designs for 6th orders, the formula i used for tuning incorporated both port lengths and port area in order to properly design. i really need/want to download a proper design program so i can input woofer parameters and really get s better view of potential outcomes.

Here ya go, exactly what you are asking for: http://www.hornresp.net/

"Nothing prevents people from knowing the truth more than the belief they already know it."
"Making bass is easy, making music is the hard part."

Builds:

U7qkMTL.jpg  LgPgE9w.jpg  Od2G3u1.jpg  xMyLoO1.jpg  9pAlXUK.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was able to drag my BP6 test box out to get some half space acoustical measurements today. Here is what I got:

FggHbxu.png

That's with 6.3 volts at 10 feet, so it should be pretty close to what a 1 watt/1 meter measurement would be.

I updated my Hornresp model to reflect what the port lengths were after I was done fiddling with them. Here is what it looks like:

XYmxATm.png

I'd say that's pretty much spot on with what I actually got out of the box as far a frequency response goes. The actual box was a little more efficient that what Hornresp predicts. I've found that usually happens, but it could very easily be something in my test setup.

"Nothing prevents people from knowing the truth more than the belief they already know it."
"Making bass is easy, making music is the hard part."

Builds:

U7qkMTL.jpg  LgPgE9w.jpg  Od2G3u1.jpg  xMyLoO1.jpg  9pAlXUK.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some happy numbers on the dB difference:

1W/1M:

image.jpg

6,1V/10 feet:

image.jpg

Using 6.3V and measuring about 8 inches short would mean 1 dB up:

2_8.jpg

Just throwing some numbers, the small error could be many other things like not using measured t/s parameters or something with the test.

Before cabin effects results seem pretty usable indeed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Who's Online   2 Members, 0 Anonymous, 2026 Guests (See full list)

×
×
  • Create New...