Jump to content

kirill007

Members
  • Posts

    3169
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by kirill007

  1. The last comment really was the best one.
  2. LOL I kinda knew they wouldn't fit, without taking out the box. The cam sure can take a beating. How do you like the sound with you're new cam?
  3. "more then twice the rated RMS on them, you can only do that if you're smart about it, so don't try it at home." This shit had me rolling. They sound mean, poor camera... Ever thought about breaking in a microphone?
  4. I use 1080P, so maybe cheaper HDMI cables don't like Full HD. Maybe that's why composite is better.(i have a samsung LED tv)
  5. lol, i had the same reaction. And the long stroke structure...
  6. I used 40€(=55$) HDMI cable for my tv and it looked worse then component. I first bought 20 dollar HDMI kables and you clearly saw a huge difference in quality when you used component in versus HMDI.(HDMI looked worse) The 40€(=55 dollar) HDMI looked better then the 20 dollar cable, but the component still looked better.(small difference) SO i would buy the better HDMI cables or components.
  7. contact DC Power, or Iraqqi or the other company's.
  8. I think 2 15's would be the loudest, but how much airspace do you have?
  9. Yes BITLD, when are they going on BladeIce, because i'm from Europe, and wanna see if i can pay them, if i can, i'll buy them.
  10. I would like to see them movin, already waiting for the vid. They look badass, especially with you're signature.
  11. It's quite a lot of port are, almost 17 sq inch, per cu ft.
  12. It's clipped to shit.
  13. Lol at the guy who commented snow trick.
  14. @Captain He says 1 per sub=5100 RMS per sub. I think you would better look into RE MT's but still, they won't like the power neither.
  15. Why would you have rise? it's not in an enclosure, the bigger the enclosure is the less rise you get. And since it's free air, their is no enclosure so their isn't a lot of rise.
  16. WTF, the excursion of that thing must be 4mm peak to peak.
  17. Dude, i said it was probably more then 4000W RMS, because stestom amps put out a whole lot of power, so it's just sick that the sub can handle the amp. So the 4000W number is probably wrong, it's probably more.
  18. I like the part 2.24 when the chicken falls over. Damn, i didn't imagine their was that much power going to the sub, if the stetsom had a slight clip, it probably was more the 4000W RMS i suppose?
  19. Don't forget it's a photo camera, not a video camera.
  20. Lol, it's already 6600w. Snow, i have to not agree with you, somebody needs to start somewhere. How could you build it if you wouldnt know what electrical upgrades you need. To Teddy9090 Probably 2 270amp alternators or more and a few big batteries.
  21. What you mean days? it should already be uploaded. JP
  22. Flat cones have the same cone area as concave cones, look at the subs from a bird view you will see they have the same cone area. If a deeper cone equals more cone area, then why wouldn't people build 2 feet deep cones? The cone area on a concave cone isn't bigger, the amount of material being used is more then a flat cone. To find the cone area of a sub you need to use this formula: 2 . π . r you don't need to know the depth of a cone.
  23. I think it's cool from meade to try all kinds of things and then post his experience with it.
×
×
  • Create New...