"more then twice the rated RMS on them, you can only do that if you're smart about it, so don't try it at home."
This shit had me rolling.
They sound mean, poor camera...
Ever thought about breaking in a microphone?
I used 40€(=55$) HDMI cable for my tv and it looked worse then component.
I first bought 20 dollar HDMI kables and you clearly saw a huge difference in quality when you used component in versus HMDI.(HDMI looked worse)
The 40€(=55 dollar) HDMI looked better then the 20 dollar cable, but the component still looked better.(small difference)
SO i would buy the better HDMI cables or components.
Why would you have rise?
it's not in an enclosure, the bigger the enclosure is the less rise you get. And since it's free air, their is no enclosure so their isn't a lot of rise.
Dude, i said it was probably more then 4000W RMS, because stestom amps put out a whole lot of power, so it's just sick that the sub can handle the amp.
So the 4000W number is probably wrong, it's probably more.
I like the part 2.24 when the chicken falls over.
Damn, i didn't imagine their was that much power going to the sub, if the stetsom had a slight clip, it probably was more the 4000W RMS i suppose?
Lol, it's already 6600w.
Snow, i have to not agree with you, somebody needs to start somewhere.
How could you build it if you wouldnt know what electrical upgrades you need.
To Teddy9090
Probably 2 270amp alternators or more and a few big batteries.
Flat cones have the same cone area as concave cones, look at the subs from a bird view you will see they have the same cone area.
If a deeper cone equals more cone area, then why wouldn't people build 2 feet deep cones?
The cone area on a concave cone isn't bigger, the amount of material being used is more then a flat cone.
To find the cone area of a sub you need to use this formula: 2 . π . r you don't need to know the depth of a cone.