Jump to content
Second Skin Audio

Does power effect box volume?


DubNDodge

Recommended Posts

Impedance rise effects the amount of power the driver sees. Efficiency is referring to the output difference with the same power applied.

Current system:

1997 Blazer - (4) Customer Fi NEO subs with (8) American Bass Elite 2800.1s

Previous systems:

2000 Suburban - (4) BTL 15's and (4) IA 40.1's = 157.7 dB at 37 Hz.

1992 Astro Van - (6) BTL 15's and (6) IA 40.1's = 159.7 dB at 43 Hz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are talking about 2 different aspects of overall efficiency at the moment, straight mechanical efficiency and box rise. The efficiency I was referring to was straight mechanical efficiency, the amount of cone movement with a given power not taking into account any impedance rise. That's why skittlesrgood seemed to contradict himself. He was talking about two entirely different concepts...The linear excursion should increase in a larger box all things the same because the air in the box exerts less pressure ie less "springingess" or resistance to cone movement. In a larger box you have to be careful because with increased cone movement with less power it becomes easier to cause over excursion the larger your enclosure becomes. If I'm mistaken in any aspect please someone correct me....And from what I've gathered box rise is just impedance rise inherent to the box's construction and its interaction with sub's electrical characteristics and tbh I don't know anything about box rise unless it is related to an induced emf and related to the amount of linear movement of the driver; then I can guess a little.

1997 Lexus ES300

HU - Pioneer MVH 7350

Processor - Helix DSP

Front Stage - JBL P660C

Mid/high amp - Alpine PDX-F4

Subs - 1 IA Death Penalty 12

Sub Amp - Cactus Sounds PF300.1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And mrskippy makes a good point, you can't magically increase a sub's power handling by a large amount just by making the box smaller. You still have the limit of thermal power handling; you can just sort of tweak a sub's mechanical power handling and efficiency at the cost of one or the other with varying enclosure volumes.

1997 Lexus ES300

HU - Pioneer MVH 7350

Processor - Helix DSP

Front Stage - JBL P660C

Mid/high amp - Alpine PDX-F4

Subs - 1 IA Death Penalty 12

Sub Amp - Cactus Sounds PF300.1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks a lot. This summed up all my questions, back to designing the box now lol.. more questions about that though in my other thread

 

'01 Dodge Stratass Sealed Trunk Build Log
2008 Honda Fit Sport Build Log

On 10/3/2013 at 10:00 AM, ROLEXrifleman said:

Anyone who says they knew everything they wanted out of life at 19 can go suck a bag of dicks cause they are lying to themselves or brought up in a cult.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and if I am not mistaken, box size does NOT effect thermal power handling.

my first thought was "no" but actually it could affect thermal power handling. in a smaller box the speaker moves less vs a larger box on the same power. the only thing that cools a sub is its movement. so if the sub moves less, it cools less. makes sense, right?

If I answered you in a well mannered, informative way, you asked a good question or had a good attitude. If I was an asshole, you asked a stupid question or you had a fucktard attitude... or I was in a bad mood.

Team BassickHU: Pioneer AVIC Z110Front: Peerless SLS 6.5", Peerless HDS 4", Rainbow tweeter - running activeAmp: JL HD600/4 and DC 4 channel (bridged to midbass)Processor: JBL MS-8Subs: 2x 12" AA MayhemsAmp: DC 3kElectrical: DC power 270xp alt. 1/0 big 4. XSpower D3400 and six D680s.

http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/121795-29-update-the-buick-is-getting-a-rebuild/

Top career scores: DBdrag 151.7 MECA SQ 82.25My SOTM build

Yeah. im pretty sure they dont warranty retarded people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The smaller the box the greater the rise in most cases

in my testing I've seen the opposite.

The air in the box serves almost like a "spring." The larger your box the lower the "springiness" of the box. The "springiness" of your box helps to control the mechanical movement of your driver. So you have a coupled relationship between your box's efficiency and its ability to help control the movement of your driver. In short if you're putting more power to a sub you want to to make the box smaller to give your sub more mechanical control in that situation at the cost of a lower efficiency. A larger box does not necessarily give your sub more thermal power handling.

Let me grasp what was said. Efficiency means impedance rise or not? If so a smaller box will have a greater impedance rise while a larger box won't. So when it's all said and done. A 1k setup in a large box could be louder than a 3k in a small box. The large box will have a smaller rise than the smaller box. If this is the case, I might rethink getting the HDC3 and just stick with 1k on sdc2.5s

the answer is in what you have been told already. a big box will have less pressure inside of it, allowing the sub to travel easier (more efficiently). while a small box creates more pressure and is less efficient. there is always a happy median between the two that takes some time, or luck, to find.

put them in 2 cubes each. 12"s in general do quite well with that airspace. its a safe size if you only want to build once.

These two statements contradict each other don't they? I thought impedance rise meant the subwoofer was becoming less efficient. Because with rise, isn't it drawing less impedance from the amplifier? Or do I have it backwards?

no, those two underlined statements are completely different entities. you dont "draw impedance". impedance is the electrical resistance presented to the amp and it dictates the wattage produced from the amp.

If I answered you in a well mannered, informative way, you asked a good question or had a good attitude. If I was an asshole, you asked a stupid question or you had a fucktard attitude... or I was in a bad mood.

Team BassickHU: Pioneer AVIC Z110Front: Peerless SLS 6.5", Peerless HDS 4", Rainbow tweeter - running activeAmp: JL HD600/4 and DC 4 channel (bridged to midbass)Processor: JBL MS-8Subs: 2x 12" AA MayhemsAmp: DC 3kElectrical: DC power 270xp alt. 1/0 big 4. XSpower D3400 and six D680s.

http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/121795-29-update-the-buick-is-getting-a-rebuild/

Top career scores: DBdrag 151.7 MECA SQ 82.25My SOTM build

Yeah. im pretty sure they dont warranty retarded people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and if I am not mistaken, box size does NOT effect thermal power handling.

my first thought was "no" but actually it could affect thermal power handling. in a smaller box the speaker moves less vs a larger box on the same power. the only thing that cools a sub is its movement. so if the sub moves less, it cools less. makes sense, right?

Yup, it does. I still think it won't be significant. But I do agree with you that that change in movement can effect cooling.

 

F150:

Stock :(

 

2019 Harley Road Glide:

Amp: TM400Xad - 4 channel 400 watt

Processor: DSR1

Fairing (Front) 6.5s -MMats PA601cx

Lid (Rear) 6x9s -  TMS69

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

and if I am not mistaken, box size does NOT effect thermal power handling.

my first thought was "no" but actually it could affect thermal power handling. in a smaller box the speaker moves less vs a larger box on the same power. the only thing that cools a sub is its movement. so if the sub moves less, it cools less. makes sense, right?

Yup, it does. I still think it won't be significant. But I do agree with you that that change in movement can effect cooling.

it can be very significant i had a tiny box for 2 18's on 4k would not move much would heat up fast and start to smell double the power to 8k they would now move a good amount and would cool themslefs and not smell for long periods of time it all depends on the install like everything

Have you ever had your woofers blown?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can play notes at tuning in a big box and have the same issue with reduced cone movement. . .

Current system:

1997 Blazer - (4) Customer Fi NEO subs with (8) American Bass Elite 2800.1s

Previous systems:

2000 Suburban - (4) BTL 15's and (4) IA 40.1's = 157.7 dB at 37 Hz.

1992 Astro Van - (6) BTL 15's and (6) IA 40.1's = 159.7 dB at 43 Hz.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...