john253a Posted August 24, 2013 Report Share Posted August 24, 2013 Don't have access to my PC for a few days Try 22-25@5 and 70-120@3 Then play around with the numbers so you get the point flattened out and within 2hz over a 40+hz range Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CleanSierra Posted August 24, 2013 Report Share Posted August 24, 2013 Good review Jefe(not writing that whole screen name). I never took the time to model, and never looked into IF that Obsidian was any good for a 6th. EBP is 29.76 though, optimum for sealed or 4th order. Im not the one you want to try to troll. Just a fyi for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbeljefe Posted August 24, 2013 Report Share Posted August 24, 2013 I'll make it even easier on you Clean, just call me BB. Cause the first two letters are my initials and what most people call me in teh real world. At least, when they're not calling me various four letter words all strung together.... And thanks. Facebook: facebook.com/audioanarchyllc Instagram: audioanarchyllc Youtube: youtube.com/bbeljefe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swishahouse22 Posted August 24, 2013 Report Share Posted August 24, 2013 so I guess il draw out a 4th order then so how big should I do each chamber I wanna get this 18 as loud as I can the amp I have for it is a MB QUART FX1.1000 Formula [media][/media] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockFord_Expedition Posted August 24, 2013 Report Share Posted August 24, 2013 not gnna lie these boxes are pretty easy to build I guess that's why I have moved to building 6th and 8th order boxes so I guess il draw out a 4th order then so how big should I do each chamber I wanna get this 18 as loud as I can the amp I have for it is a MB QUART FX1.1000 Formula I thought you said they were easy? Old School/New School RF Build March 2015 SOTM Winner How to crimp large wire Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbeljefe Posted August 24, 2013 Report Share Posted August 24, 2013 To be fair, he said they were easy to build, not design... Here's the Obsidian modeled in a couple 4th orders: Both of these models assume two 4" round ports, for ~25 in² of port area. Both have vent machs of .02, which is well below the .06 threshold for a free flowing vent, for the 1KW you have to power the sub. The blue graph is: Vf = 2 ftⁿ Vr = 4 ftⁿ Fv = 40 hz Vl = 18" This box extends from -3dB at 20 hz to -3dB at 80 hz but it's -1dB through the high 30s to the low 40s. The yellow graph is: Vf = 3 ftⁿ Vr = 6 ftⁿ Fv = 35 hz Vl = 15.31" This one stays above flat throughout the passband and extends from 19 to 63 hz. It's not a perfectly smooth response but I don't know that I have time to play with it enough to get a perfectly flat line above flat. I did check to see what would happen if you made Vf 4 ftⁿ @ 35 hz and the response flattens out a good bit and, stays +3dB from 25 to 48 hz. Oh and, Vl for that alignment would be 10.74". I also modeled at 2.5 & 5 ftⁿ, owing to the max manufacturer's recommendation for sealed boxes and the curve was no better than the yellow one above. Personally, if I had the space, I'd stick that fucker in a t-line and make a beast out of it. You'd need an 11' long line with 202 in² of (port) area but if you could fit it, you'd definitely have a loud as fawk box with the widest possible bandwidth. I'll be finishing up the one I built for an SA-15 today and will post up a video in my t-line thread. Facebook: facebook.com/audioanarchyllc Instagram: audioanarchyllc Youtube: youtube.com/bbeljefe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tahoe2004 Posted August 24, 2013 Author Report Share Posted August 24, 2013 I honestly wasnt expecting to see a lot of good information in this page! What i though that i wouldnt require alot math done i now know that i does require. But Thanks a lot !! I really aprecciate all this info that have just left all quiet xD. Btw i have a question for BB? Is that red flat response u got on the computer a good thing or a bad thing ? Thats something i havent got told yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bbeljefe Posted August 24, 2013 Report Share Posted August 24, 2013 The red line isn't a response line, it just highlights 0dB. The purple line below it is the -3dB or, 3 db down point, which is where loudspeakers become audibly quieter. Facebook: facebook.com/audioanarchyllc Instagram: audioanarchyllc Youtube: youtube.com/bbeljefe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DylanBunch Posted August 24, 2013 Report Share Posted August 24, 2013 To be fair, he said they were easy to build, not design... Here's the Obsidian modeled in a couple 4th orders: Both of these models assume two 4" round ports, for ~25 in² of port area. Both have vent machs of .02, which is well below the .06 threshold for a free flowing vent, for the 1KW you have to power the sub. The blue graph is: Vf = 2 ftⁿ Vr = 4 ftⁿ Fv = 40 hz Vl = 18" This box extends from -3dB at 20 hz to -3dB at 80 hz but it's -1dB through the high 30s to the low 40s. The yellow graph is: Vf = 3 ftⁿ Vr = 6 ftⁿ Fv = 35 hz Vl = 15.31" This one stays above flat throughout the passband and extends from 19 to 63 hz. It's not a perfectly smooth response but I don't know that I have time to play with it enough to get a perfectly flat line above flat. I did check to see what would happen if you made Vf 4 ftⁿ @ 35 hz and the response flattens out a good bit and, stays +3dB from 25 to 48 hz. Oh and, Vl for that alignment would be 10.74". I also modeled at 2.5 & 5 ftⁿ, owing to the max manufacturer's recommendation for sealed boxes and the curve was no better than the yellow one above. Personally, if I had the space, I'd stick that fucker in a t-line and make a beast out of it. You'd need an 11' long line with 202 in² of (port) area but if you could fit it, you'd definitely have a loud as fawk box with the widest possible bandwidth. I'll be finishing up the one I built for an SA-15 today and will post up a video in my t-line thread. i believe the side that asks for the tuning frequency is the ported side which needs to be the same size or bigger than the box that doesnt ask for a tuning frequency which is the sealed side 2006 Ford Explorer 2 Team AA/Sundown 15s 6th order Ct Sounds 7k 4 PRV Mr500 8s Rockford p1000-2 Team Subsonic Lows Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john253a Posted August 24, 2013 Report Share Posted August 24, 2013 On that same graph Can you post a standard ported box at say 28 and 35 So people can see the differance Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.