Jump to content

I AM A VS THREAD!!!! But one I think might be ok here.


Recommended Posts

Posted

Camera was watching the Voltage, but I was watching both to see what it was. If I would have tried to show both meters, you wouldnt have been able to see either number. Just using my iphone for the video.

Posted

Cody, what about if you took that 900 some watts and multiplied it by the amp efficiency. Obviously you can't get as accurate as a amp dyne or amm1 but maybe it would make it more realistic?

My old YouTube channel : http://www.youtube.com/user/SwordLords1234?feature=mhee

My old build log : http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/161872-96-accord-b2-sundown-sky-high-dc-power-re-re-build-for-heatwave/page-37

My New Build - http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/207041-2016-mazda-6-sql-build/

2016 Mazda 6 Touring

JL Fix 86 - OEM signal correction

B2 prototype DSP 6to8

B2 Ref63 - 3 way active set

2 B2 Class H quattro's

1 B2 Zero.5R @.5

2 B2 HNv3 12 d2

B2 SLIP40 - Lithium in the trunk

Northstar Group 35 under the hood

100ft 2/0 welding cable

30ft 4ga welding cable

20ft 8ga welding cable

All stinger OFC speaker wire

Soundrive custom RCA's

Tons of attention to detail.... Can it be perfect?

Posted

Cody, what about if you took that 900 some watts and multiplied it by the amp efficiency. Obviously you can't get as accurate as a amp dyne or amm1 but maybe it would make it more realistic?

Based on other testing I have done, it does get you back down to a realistic number. Most of these Korean amps are roughly 70% efficient. If you take 70% of the 922w, that gives you 645.4w. Pretty close.

Posted

Cody, what about if you took that 900 some watts and multiplied it by the amp efficiency. Obviously you can't get as accurate as a amp dyne or amm1 but maybe it would make it more realistic?

Based on other testing I have done, it does get you back down to a realistic number. Most of these Korean amps are roughly 70% efficient. If you take 70% of the 922w, that gives you 645.4w. Pretty close.

that seems a bit arbitray to me considering you are measuring something the efficiency has already affected. Bit redundant don't you think?

Posted

The whole point of this is that clamping is a crap shoot.

If you were to leave the DMM and Clamp right next to each other and video them, you are now going to have to go through and try to find the highest point. BUT and this is a BIG BUTT, just because the 2 different tools are showing those numbers on the screen at the same time, doesnt mean that those number both occurred at the same exact time.

To do this, you have to have a tool that is reading BOTH signals at precisely the same exact time. That is where the AMM1 comes into play.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 3083 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
×
×
  • Create New...