Jump to content
Second Skin Audio

New just for fun box idea, 12 12s


Recommended Posts

Posted

So i couldn't sleep and decided to play around with torres and sketchup and came up with this. It is based around 12 DC XL12s at around 3ft^3 per sub after displacement. Port tuning on torres came out a little funky at 21hz but i don't think that is right due to the baffles actually being the ports. Cool thing about this tho is it would fit behind the 2nd row of a 'Burban without cutting on the roof or fender wells. Just figured i'd throw this out there for everyones input.

Screenshot%2036_zps7d7xc11i.png

Posted

Interesting design. Here are a couple of my thoughts:

1. At 3 cu ft per sub, the box is WAY too big for those subs, they probably wouldn't last long on reasonable power.

2. When you have the subs fire into the port like that, funky things happen. Its not going to perform like a conventional ported box. You could model its output with something like HornResp though.

"Nothing prevents people from knowing the truth more than the belief they already know it."
"Making bass is easy, making music is the hard part."

Builds:

U7qkMTL.jpg  LgPgE9w.jpg  Od2G3u1.jpg  xMyLoO1.jpg  9pAlXUK.jpg

Posted

The volume issue worried me as well. I believe if i made the enclosure about 6" narrower it would remedy the size issue, but lower the tuning even further. I'm unfamiliar with Hornresp tho, would it be too much trouble to ask you to model this box? I've hit the limit of my knowledge at this point lol.

Posted

I love this I just think the port needs to be bigger , so much pressure is gonna be coming out of that port but I say go for it. Looks great.

2022 Ford Maverick on 22’s                                                                                                                                          Skar SK1500.1 on 4 Skar VD-8’s                                                                                                                       Mids Sundown Super tweeters, Skar TX 6.5 components on Skar SKM400.4                                                 LC2 for audio control  , XS Power D680 XS Series Extra Battery 

Posted

Been done before, quite a few years ago with 12 18's.

I think this is the thread but it seems like most pics don't show up.

Yea i've seen this design done a few times now. I was just curious if i could successfully design one and theoretically make it work. Most of the enclosures i design for myself are made to fit in the back of a 2000 - 2006 suburban without removing the second row of seats. I think it is a lot more impressive to be truly loud and still be able to seat more than 2 people. That was actually the entire reason i bought a Suburban in the first place, to fit a big system and still have seating room.

Posted

I love this I just think the port needs to be bigger , so much pressure is gonna be coming out of that port but I say go for it. Looks great.

I agree. Because the port and baffle are one in the same, making the port larger will subsequently lower the internal volume, which is exactly what i need to do anyway.

Posted

Build this beast post pics, just by looking at it , it doesn't look like 3ft per sub . But it looks really nice

2022 Ford Maverick on 22’s                                                                                                                                          Skar SK1500.1 on 4 Skar VD-8’s                                                                                                                       Mids Sundown Super tweeters, Skar TX 6.5 components on Skar SKM400.4                                                 LC2 for audio control  , XS Power D680 XS Series Extra Battery 

Posted

Build this beast post pics, just by looking at it , it doesn't look like 3ft per sub . But it looks really nice

lol I wish, for 12 XLs and 3 10k amps would be right around $13,000. A guy can dream tho lol.

Posted

The volume issue worried me as well. I believe if i made the enclosure about 6" narrower it would remedy the size issue, but lower the tuning even further. I'm unfamiliar with Hornresp tho, would it be too much trouble to ask you to model this box? I've hit the limit of my knowledge at this point lol.

Sure here ya go. This is the box as you have it right now:

IPsjVqM.png

Tuning came out to around 20 hz, like you predicted. That spike in output down low is significantly less than ideal IMHO, and the box is way too big.

j5q6JLF.png

Here it is with the net volume reduced to 18 cu ft and the port area increased. This raises the tuning to around 33 Hz and greatly reduces the port velocity, which is a problem you would have run into with your original design. We still have a pretty big spike in the frequency response though.

sITVd9O.png

For comparison purpose, here is a more conventionally laid out port box. Same specs, 18 cu ft at 33 Hz. As you can see it has much smoother frequency response. That big spike is what you tend to get with the subs mounted in the port.

"Nothing prevents people from knowing the truth more than the belief they already know it."
"Making bass is easy, making music is the hard part."

Builds:

U7qkMTL.jpg  LgPgE9w.jpg  Od2G3u1.jpg  xMyLoO1.jpg  9pAlXUK.jpg

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 4424 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
×
×
  • Create New...