Jump to content

fecupe2001

Members
  • Posts

    5911
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by fecupe2001

  1. This is correct on theory, but since it´s a single sub and it´s displacement isn´t that big, to the ears it won´t change anything, if we were talking about 4 subs i guess it would be another story
  2. That small?? damn, i was thinking maybe around 0.6 cubic feet per sub, but you know way more than me
  3. Fixed for ya!! hahahaa man that was epic!!!
  4. Not bad ram , sexy box, those angles acttualy look sexy, what´s the port aera? those subs LOVE a big ass port, also, about the angle on the back, i use that in my explorer bu i haven´t done a test if that helps or doesn´t, i´m gonna do it on my "SPL Gains" topic, i guess that if you are using it it helped you in the past, any input about that?? keep up the good work hommie...
  5. sexy port!! hahaha, not bad, it´s always fun to find all things and remember all that hehe, i had a pair of those same subs on a sealed box with a kicker impulse ix2302, that shit was crazy loud!! i mean, something like 141 dbs?? damn i was the best lol
  6. It´s always too early for you hommie hahaha, your comments always gives me a big LOL
  7. We love you! hahahaha For real man, also the link???? damn!! Anyways, AQ it´s also a good brand but more expensive, you can´t find anything better than the crescendo on that price...
  8. I´ve tested inverted subs before and score was almost the same , it had a small displacement so the internal space of the box didn´t change much affecting the score, in other words, for a daily application you can invert it without any problems, do it!
  9. I´ve always thought that middle should score better since both subs are at the same distance and you should get a better airflow, but it´s just a theory, i trust you my friend, have you tested both things on the meter? what´s the difference between both application?
  10. trial and error like SPL? hehe ok i guess i have to try that, thanks a lot hommie...
  11. dude!! haha that video was great, who would think that some years later people could hear tons of dbs louder without loosing any hearing lol, it was funny the 145 dbs part hehe, thanks for posting this...
  12. That´s what i use to think hommie, but after trying a lot of DD´s , the 3500´s seem to get just as loud with low power than a 2500´s with a good amount of power, i honestly tell you this, i don´t like my 2500´s as much as i love my 3500´s and even my 1500´s , they seem to get hot faster and can´t take the same amount of abuse, don´t ask me why, but i´m not the only one using 2500´s saying that same thing
  13. DAMN! i didn´t know this things got so height, i did skyding, not a big deal if you ask me, this looks more fun!!
  14. Dam ill go find out lol I know the shop I asked gave me a number that was ~$150 higher than what I was willing to pay. I can't remember anyone badmouthing DD over anything except pricing though. I do, those little stupid pieces of shit are fucking loud
  15. PM rival904 , he can quote you that sub...
  16. expensive hehe, i don´t know at the US, over here it costs around 400$ or something stupid like that lol
  17. You haven´t said your price range, but i´ve tried a couple of boxes for the DD 3510 before and that thing it´s amazing, stupid loud and low and takes tons of abuse, just saying...
  18. I´m kind of interested on the MLA module, i always thought that it was used only with stock alts, i have a mechman 270A on my 99 2 gen explorer with a 4.0 soch engine , is that the same plug? would i have to change something? i´m kind of interested on this one, need more dbsssss
  19. thanks for the input man, dude i tried that the last time and the song was crap lol, sounded horrible even when i added the new tone
  20. That´s a great introduction man, a pleasure to have you on this forum my man, welcome!!
  21. Hey guys, i´ve learned how to use audacity so far thanks to people on this forum, specially with great inputs from my boy bigpimpin, anyways, i´ve used funny ass songs for hairtricks by just adding tones on them since the original song doesn´t have any bass, something stupid like 3dbs hehe. Said that, i do have a few songs wich i love the lyrics but the frequency is way higher than where my car peaks, for example, reaggeton and all kind of latin music. I would love to do 2 things: 1) eliminate the original bass and just add some tones. 2) Been able to raise or drop the peak frequency of the song but using the same original bass line without slowing or getting the song faster wich are the only ways i know to change the peak frequency of a song. Thanks a lot for your help guys! P.S: I tried bass boosting the frequency i wanted but the peak remains the same and starts to soung like crap!
  22. give me your email adress and i´ll send you all of them...
  23. i think so, that test is coming this weekend on my topic...
  24. MY GOD!!! i thought i was gonna see some smoke at last haha, that shit doesn´t brake down no matter what you do
  25. I´m with meade on this one, i only take into account the straight part , at least that´s what my testings has showed me in the past HAHAHAA that was a good one!!
×
×
  • Create New...