RickyFriery97 Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 ok, first off, this is NOT a VS thread. and i do not want it turning into one, just asking for opinions. so out of these two, witch would you run, and why? both powering a XL 18" AQ2200D @ .5 ohm Rockford Fosgate T2500BDCP @ 2 ohm 2014 Chevy Silverado Crewcab 1994 Chevy Full Size blazer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C-Fizzy Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 Fosgate. Definitely. But if I was limited on money, the AQ. under construction I hate People with crappy primered cars rolling on hubcaps that are louder then me. u hate c-fizzy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bassrace Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 If the same price which I doubt id run the rockford only because running at 2 ohms it would be easier on voltage. 145.9@40hz 145.3@34hz big 3 X2 group 34 Deka Group 31 All 0/1 awg jl meta wire Alpine CDA 7894 Orion HCCA D5000 2 AQ HDC312's Crunch gpv1100.2 (for 6.5"s only) AQ pro audio 6.5" - 3 sets AQ supertweeters - 2 sets 2000 Slamry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jd1102 Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 fosgate prob puts out close to the aq even at 2 ohms and everyone knows the fosgates are beast amps i would choose fosgate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ray Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 Rf all day. No doubt at all 2008 California state record holder 157.2 Bassrace2009 California state record holder 157.0 BassraceRollin 50's 158.7db2009 King of Cali Bassrace2009 USACi score 160.5 @ 42hz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
C-Fizzy Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 If the same price which I doubt id run the rockford only because running at 2 ohms it would be easier on voltage. Not true, still pulls the same amount of amperage, but it is more efficient at 2 ohms. Which means more power in the long run. under construction I hate People with crappy primered cars rolling on hubcaps that are louder then me. u hate c-fizzy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DudeWith4x4 Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 Fosgate. Would be better on your electrical too right? Not running on .5 ohm that is. ninjaed. -Ross Project Layla Truck: 99' F-150 Gathering things for my next build. SoloX18 build: http://www.stevemead..._1#entry1576460 RE T-line build: http://www.stevemead...-between-build/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JEMT8 Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 Fosgate if you have the money. More efficient on your electrical and you won't void a warranty like you would running the AQ formerly known as Jaylor Swift Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoudNLow931 Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 Honestly I would stay away from AQ. If you have the money get the RF. 2008 Dodge Ram 2500 6.7l Cummins 4 FT1s C1600.2 8 PWX 8s ONX2.100 Audio Technix Wiring & Sound Deadener My Youtube Feedback Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quiet Posted September 6, 2011 Report Share Posted September 6, 2011 ok, first off, this is NOT a VS thread. and i do not want it turning into one, just asking for opinions. so out of these two, witch would you run, and why? both powering a XL 18" AQ2200D @ .5 ohm Rockford Fosgate T2500BDCP @ 2 ohm AQ. Not because I'm hating on RF, but because I can get 3 AQs for the price of the T2500BDCP. Even better, I can get a bigger alt, couple more batteries, wire and a second 2200D for the same money. I'm sure the RF is better in a lot of regards, but I'm value-oriented. 2007 Pacifica Rebuild. Less quiet. Still not loud. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.