Jump to content

RAINBOW RAINBOW RAINBOW!!!!!!!


Recommended Posts

man i just cant pull that trigger.... lmao........... college is a beast and so are bills

he wouldnt be the first to say they did a 167 with a system like that (one that clearly DOESNT), but i have to say, he didnt beat me anywhere, ive never competed against the guy. If he thinks his does a 167, mine would probably put him in a coma. :hairtrick:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Awww, wtf dude? Infinity Reference 6030 are 2 ohm and don't sound TOO bad.

ok let me ask you this on a scale of 1-10 how much better do the rainbows sound vs other things youve herd.. like comparing them to the infinitys

he wouldnt be the first to say they did a 167 with a system like that (one that clearly DOESNT), but i have to say, he didnt beat me anywhere, ive never competed against the guy. If he thinks his does a 167, mine would probably put him in a coma. :hairtrick:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rainbow speakers have always looked tempting to me... I'm not sure I can afford the set, thinking to try out IA's new component set... :peepwall:

Pioneer Premier P880PRS ll Front Stage: US Acoustics 4060 - Random speakers currently ll Sub Stage: Crescendo BC3500D - 15" Xcon sealed @ 3.28 cubes ll Electrical: - Kinetik HC1800(front) NEW***DieHard P-2(rear)

beaker- I know this sounds like a lot of anime bullshit, but it is true.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a whole lot cleaner and clearer, especially when the volume goes up, no harshness in the tweets and no distortion from the mids.

compared to what? I've owned the reference rainbows (highest) so i'd like to know what your comparing the SLC's next to lowest to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Damn you Orion..... Lol..... Your gonna force my hand

he wouldnt be the first to say they did a 167 with a system like that (one that clearly DOESNT), but i have to say, he didnt beat me anywhere, ive never competed against the guy. If he thinks his does a 167, mine would probably put him in a coma. :hairtrick:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a whole lot cleaner and clearer, especially when the volume goes up, no harshness in the tweets and no distortion from the mids.

compared to what? I've owned the reference rainbows (highest) so i'd like to know what your comparing the SLC's next to lowest to.

James what's your opinion on these..... And just for giggles if you had a 400 dollar budget what would you invest in

he wouldnt be the first to say they did a 167 with a system like that (one that clearly DOESNT), but i have to say, he didnt beat me anywhere, ive never competed against the guy. If he thinks his does a 167, mine would probably put him in a coma. :hairtrick:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

for 400 dollars i'd look at used hi energy comps, new ID chameleons, may be lucky enough to fine some focal k2p at 400 even. The SLC are to low of a line for me to consider at that price point considering the sound to performance ratio.

From your original post it looks like you want volume and rainbow SLC wouldnt be my first or even near first choice for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you feel that strongly about the Image Dynamics chameleon cxs62?

he wouldnt be the first to say they did a 167 with a system like that (one that clearly DOESNT), but i have to say, he didnt beat me anywhere, ive never competed against the guy. If he thinks his does a 167, mine would probably put him in a coma. :hairtrick:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Who's Online   0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1679 Guests (See full list)

    • There are no registered users currently online
×
×
  • Create New...