Skullz Posted July 2, 2013 Report Share Posted July 2, 2013 I just posted that to bust yalls balls. lol For most people a nice quality H/U, tablet or smartphone will suffice our needs. 01 Ford focus ZX3 Pioneer AVH-X491BHS PPI PC 4800.2 Morel Maximo 6.5" x2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoomZoom808 Posted July 2, 2013 Report Share Posted July 2, 2013 I enjoy the convenience of Bluetooth and if you demo there is always somebody who wants to hear THEIR song which makes it easy to say go ahead pair your phone and play your song but I still prefer CD. There will always be a niche for high end equipment for the features but also for the status symbol they represent. 2010 Mazda 3s 2.5L Pioneer DEH-X9600BHS Knu OFC 1/0 SS Platinum AGM / XS Power XP750 Alpine PDX F-4 / Morel Maximo 5 + Coax 5 IA 10.1 / SSA XCON 12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gally Posted July 2, 2013 Report Share Posted July 2, 2013 I enjoy the convenience of Bluetooth and if you demo there is always somebody who wants to hear THEIR song which makes it easy to say go ahead pair your phone and play your song but I still prefer CD. There will always be a niche for high end equipment for the features but also for the status symbol they represent. also i like double dins...like pioneers AVH series... 2010 Chevrolet Cruze Radio --- pioneer mvh-200vbt Front/back --- alpine type s 6.5" Sub Control --- Pac LC1 Sub Amp --- GZPA 1.4K Sub --- GZNW 15XSPL D1 Battery - GZBP 12.2500X Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROLEXrifleman Posted July 2, 2013 Author Report Share Posted July 2, 2013 Unless you have heard a truly high end system then you wouldn't even begin to ask a question like that. Unless your are completely closed minded to the fact that technological advances have put us in a time where it possible to achieve the highest quality sound reproduction from a mobile device in car then your foolish to make that statement. Has anyone won an SQ award with a tablet or other device? I don't know, doesn't mean there aren't any systems out there who couldn't. Are you the same type of person that still has a record player because it produces a "warmer" sound than a cd? Rolex you sicken me. Just let me finish my pie ~ Juice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyblack76 Posted July 2, 2013 Report Share Posted July 2, 2013 Jesus H, watch that POST button.. LOL But yeah dude.. i get what your saying. And, how anal you wanna go, im sure it can get all sorts of ODD. SMD SUPER SELLER The Burban Build Blazer Build sold Acura trunk build sold Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROLEXrifleman Posted July 2, 2013 Author Report Share Posted July 2, 2013 That's funny, here I am raving about mobile devices and my iPhone piece of shot decides to triple post!! lol I'm getting an oil change at the Honda dealer and it keeps bouncing between wifi and 3g Rolex you sicken me. Just let me finish my pie ~ Juice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kyblack76 Posted July 2, 2013 Report Share Posted July 2, 2013 LOL.... i knew it.. LOL SMD SUPER SELLER The Burban Build Blazer Build sold Acura trunk build sold Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ROLEXrifleman Posted July 2, 2013 Author Report Share Posted July 2, 2013 I'm gonna run my iPhone to my EPX2 via pin out to input b. Input a is being used by my alpine 7897 phantom face I just don't see how running signal (mobile device) through an active device ( radio) and then to another active device ( processor) is beneficial. The cleanest path between two points has minimal processing. Running iPhones into a radio does something to the signal b4 it gets to the processor. I want the processor doing all the work thus I'm bypassing the radio. And since my epx2 had the RDAT I get the best of both worlds in my application Rolex you sicken me. Just let me finish my pie ~ Juice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shogen Posted July 2, 2013 Report Share Posted July 2, 2013 but if your HU has all the processing then its okay to do it..? I'm just looking to hear more from you ... I mean some HU has AUX through RCA/stereo mini ... others have USB .... which is "better"??? lol .... I use RCA on my P880 currently.... but I'd love to have USB so there isn't anything being done to the file before it's played. ... but that's just me I'm gonna run my iPhone to my EPX2 via pin out to input b. Input a is being used by my alpine 7897 phantom faceI just don't see how running signal (mobile device) through an active device ( radio) and then to another active device ( processor) is beneficial. The cleanest path between two points has minimal processing. Running iPhones into a radio does something to the signal b4 it gets to the processor. I want the processor doing all the work thus I'm bypassing the radio. And since my epx2 had the RDAT I get the best of both worlds in my application Pioneer Premier P880PRS ll Front Stage: US Acoustics 4060 - Random speakers currently ll Sub Stage: Crescendo BC3500D - 15" Xcon sealed @ 3.28 cubes ll Electrical: - Kinetik HC1800(front) NEW***DieHard P-2(rear) beaker- I know this sounds like a lot of anime bullshit, but it is true. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoomZoom808 Posted July 2, 2013 Report Share Posted July 2, 2013 I would say USB is better allows you to bypass the DAC in the mobile/tablet/ipad device. I also can't stand every time I get an email the music skips via Bluetooth. 2010 Mazda 3s 2.5L Pioneer DEH-X9600BHS Knu OFC 1/0 SS Platinum AGM / XS Power XP750 Alpine PDX F-4 / Morel Maximo 5 + Coax 5 IA 10.1 / SSA XCON 12 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.