Jump to content
Second Skin Audio

TLDR


PinkFreud65

Recommended Posts

SAs get low. you will be happier with the extra cone area. Dont tune too low, though, you'll likely cheat yourself out of some dB's at best. If you do tune lower, you'll have to increase your net volume to make up for it.

2007 Pacifica
Rebuild. Less quiet. Still not loud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 sa 12s

On 3/28/2014 at 4:22 PM, KyLar96 said:

Its all about the music anyway..... Do a proper install, something your happy with, Fuck everyone else...... improve in time, where you can..... its not rocket science...

Tiburon build //www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/174059-97-hyundai-tiburon-build-from-ramming-to-slamming-slow-5k-build/

2000 Mountaineer build http://www.stevemeadedesigns.com/board/topic/186736-2000-mountaineer-build-from-ramming-to-slamming-part-iislow-5k-builddc-audio-americanbassxspowersingerarcaudiostingershcavideo-on-pg7/

2000 Mercury Mountaineer: Electrical:Singer 360 hairpin powdercoated white alt, Big 4 double run 1/0 SHCA OFC, 4 runs 1/0 OFC SHCA, limitless 70ah, HU: Pioneer deh80prs interiors: Skar sk85.4 on sb acoustics neo dome tweeters 2 Mmats sq4100s on 4 silver flute 8s(4ohm) SUB Stage: 3 DC5K [email protected] on 6 ascendant audio mayhem 12s d1.4s fully loaded

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I vote x15 if you want low lows or if you want to move air. Contrary to everyone siting cone area as a reason to go 12s, the x15 will actually move more air.

potential air movement (displacement) is a function of surface area & cone travel, not just surface area. While the sa12s have more cone area, it's not that much more.

2x 12s = Roughly 226sqin

1x 15 = roughly 176sqin

The outlook changes quickly when you factor in xmax.

Sa-12 = 19mm (~0.75in)

X-15 = 30mm (~1.18in)

Let's do some figures:

Sa-12s: 226 × 0.75 = 132 in^3

X-15: 176 x 1.18 = 207 in^3

Now when you consider that is only 1 way displacement, the gap increases even more.

Sa-12s 132in^3 * 2 = 264in^3

X-15. 207in^3 * 2 = 414in^3

Also, those referencing 2 coils to dissipate heat would be regarding power handling I would assume. In this case, that's a moot point since 2x sa-12s rms is 1500w, and the x15 is rated at 1500wrms.

Now if you want to do numbers the sa8s might be the better option due to efficiency and the fact that box rise at the enclosure volumes 12s require is generally less so you will probably get more power out of your amp.

Either way, I personally would go with the 15 ifI had room. Hopefully you can make a better assessment based on the information I provided, kinda depends on what you're going for. Either way I'm sure you won'tbe disappointed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

if that were the case the RE XXX would be the loudest lowest sub on earth at 54mm Xmax, but we live in the real world.

Xmax matters, but it isn't the end all in SPL and sweeping air. Once you get beyond a certain point, your motor has to be able to sustain it, and the X just won't do what you think it will.

2007 Pacifica
Rebuild. Less quiet. Still not loud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I vote x15 if you want low lows or if you want to move air. Contrary to everyone siting cone area as a reason to go 12s, the x15 will actually move more air.

potential air movement (displacement) is a function of surface area & cone travel, not just surface area. While the sa12s have more cone area, it's not that much more.

2x 12s = Roughly 226sqin

1x 15 = roughly 176sqin

The outlook changes quickly when you factor in xmax.

Sa-12 = 19mm (~0.75in)

X-15 = 30mm (~1.18in)

Let's do some figures:

Sa-12s: 226 × 0.75 = 132 in^3

X-15: 176 x 1.18 = 207 in^3

Now when you consider that is only 1 way displacement, the gap increases even more.

Sa-12s 132in^3 * 2 = 264in^3

X-15. 207in^3 * 2 = 414in^3

Also, those referencing 2 coils to dissipate heat would be regarding power handling I would assume. In this case, that's a moot point since 2x sa-12s rms is 1500w, and the x15 is rated at 1500wrms.

Now if you want to do numbers the sa8s might be the better option due to efficiency and the fact that box rise at the enclosure volumes 12s require is generally less so you will probably get more power out of your amp.

Either way, I personally would go with the 15 ifI had room. Hopefully you can make a better assessment based on the information I provided, kinda depends on what you're going for. Either way I'm sure you won'tbe disappointed.

The problem with your analysis is that sub cone displacement is really only relevant when it comes to sealed boxes. With ported boxes maximum output isn't limited by cone excursion over much of their usable bandwidth, so the fact that the X-15 has great excursion capacity is irrelevant.

"Nothing prevents people from knowing the truth more than the belief they already know it."
"Making bass is easy, making music is the hard part."

Builds:

U7qkMTL.jpg  LgPgE9w.jpg  Od2G3u1.jpg  xMyLoO1.jpg  9pAlXUK.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...