ChevyBoy95

he knows. BUT THAT CLAMPING METHOD IS STILL THE STANDARD FOR CAR AUDIO until something like the AD-1 or the new D'Amore tool comes out to the public in high supply.

lol, almost every kenwood excelon does, i have 3 that all are clean 35 of 35.

you are clipping somewhere, i had 2 copper HDC3's on a 5k all day no issues.

port is way too small..... i would use that port for maybe 2 18s..... you have the cone area of almost 4 18's....

only thing, i wish it didnt stop its true power dyno at clipping. some/most competitors go into clipping, so this would in turn give them a unless number (not completely useless), but you get the point. it would be cool if it was possible to be able to include or omit the clipping stopping point.

I know, my measurements were with the side panels still intact, I still gotta rip all that good stuff out and get some new measurements and see what im working exactly. The amps I wanna put two racks in, 1 on each side of the car in the windows slanted. I just gotta dive in and get a box built So I can build the rest of the car lol. I really only been playing decaf and low hitting songs. Don't big into high note songs. I will change it if i don't like how it hits. Thanks for the help with specs. I will take them into consideration . I kinda wanna keep the top of the box level with the top of my back seats head rest. but I may have to sacrifice that want lol. if you want a box that wont flex and is done right, you will.

this is what i came up with. Port is still small for me, but not knowing how much height you are willing to give up, this is about as good as it is going to get. Doubled all around, triple baffle, didnt do bracing because it is just a visual representation.

i would do double all around and triple baffle, with about 250 plus sq in of port tuned to low 30's. if you run out of room.... then you dont have room for 8 12's. 6 12s in a great box will shit on 8 12s in a tiny box.

vid is a waste anyway.

damn. i dont even want to know how much that ran you... sexy though.

lulz. good to know im not the only one.

it will do it for about 30 seconds then work again. Been getting it off an on all day.

unboxings mainly.

are you serious, i havent seen one person hate on a ct sounds product, everything coleman puts out performs to spec or above and beyond. Plus he has better prices than 80% of the market.

10,311

he basically said F SMD and went to rickteg forum or whatever it is called to show them how to set a ride on fire.

who the hell are you buying 1/0 CCA from that sells it for 2.31 a foot? Should be about a dollar less than that.... shipped.

well here is a little math i did.... 1 20ft piece of OFC 1/0 500A load, loss of 1V and 500w 2 20ft pieces of CCA 1/0 (so 250a per cable)[this being less money than 1/0 OFC] 250A load x 2 (so 250 per cable), loss of 0.85V and 425w (212.5w per cable) Tony, is this correct? or is it there more to it than just dividing by 2 when using 2 cables instead of 1?

Story is good, gameplay is extremely good, ton o side stuff, and morr

Bought 2 HDC4's from kevin, he shipped next day on both, gave me a great deal, couldnt have been happier.

it doesnt. because you cant put 2 engines in one engine bay. would a 800hp engine that costs less than a 500hp engine be better? engines are a TERRIBLE analogy for this.

Not to be an ass, but the opinion pushed is being backed by REAL WORLD TESTING, not on paper. yes as a DIRECT comparison, OFC > CCA, but for current carrying capacity (not resistance), for the cost CCA is better. You can do 3 runs of CCA for the price of 1 Run of OFC. OFC will carry 300 max, CCA will carry close to 600. So are you willing to lose battery capacity in extra resistance? Cost isn't the only factor influencing the answer here. actually, i will take a .1 or .2v loss from resistance from CCA and have MORE power getting to my batteries and amplifiers than gain .2v and not have as much juice flowing back i have tried both in my truck... came out that 4 runs of CCA bounced my voltage back faster than 2 runs or OFC or 1 run of 3/0 welding, and maintained better voltage during play....

if you do this test, use 1 run of OFC, then double or triple inputs for CCA, to see what is better for the cost.

Tony is the most intelligent on this forum on this topic... But that doesn't mean everything gets a free pass, we just want some explaining, especially when real world record holders are using CCA and not OFC.

Not to be an ass, but the opinion pushed is being backed by REAL WORLD TESTING, not on paper. yes as a DIRECT comparison, OFC > CCA, but for current carrying capacity (not resistance), for the cost CCA is better. You can do 3 runs of CCA for the price of 1 Run of OFC. OFC will carry 300 max, CCA will carry close to 600.