ChrisAllen Posted November 23, 2011 Report Posted November 23, 2011 Out of curiosity, and I know it'll perform really well, how does the CDL do for 100% coverage? Quote
Sanitarium Posted November 23, 2011 Report Posted November 23, 2011 (edited) You missed the entire mark on this one. Your saying that means you missed the point of my post, and so did jon as it seems. oh well, ill carry on misunderstood and y'all carry on selling stuff that doesn't do a bit of good for half the target audience of this forum. Note the gfaphs had huge spikes down low, where most of us want deadening to begin with. Edited November 23, 2011 by Sanitarium Quote
IH8PunkRok Posted November 23, 2011 Report Posted November 23, 2011 i want to see some alpha damp on there Quote -Matt2005 Dodge Magnum RTJVC KD-AVX1 2 PPI S580.2 Obsidian Audio ST1 Horn Tweeters PRV 8MB450s Audio Legion 3500.1D 2 RE MT 18s 360 ah LiFePO4 BatterySHCA 2/0 155.2 @ 29 hzKicker CVR 15's buildDD 3512e buildMini T-Line Build(6) 8s BuildNightshade 15s Wall BuildMagnum AB XFL 12s BuildNewest Magnum Build
baaudio Posted November 23, 2011 Report Posted November 23, 2011 this test is one ive been waiting on for a while. i argue with people all the time that peal n seal is just not a valid equivalent to any sort of real sound deadener. im def going to bookmark this at work to prove this to people (i work sales at a car stereo shop). it should definitely help my argument. thanks jon for a great test! also im curious for a test of 100% cld coverage. and why was the peal n seal in strips? isnt it a big roll or is it precut strips from manufacturer? ive never used the product. just curious if the strips vs solid piece would effect results as well. Quote Team NWSPL baaudio Build Log 2001 GMC Sierra walkthrough 4 Mechman Elite 370s, 10 AGM batteries, 3 Crossfire XS v2 18s, Crossfire 8k
Second Skin Rep Jon Posted November 23, 2011 Author Report Posted November 23, 2011 (edited) Out of curiosity, and I know it'll perform really well, how does the CDL do for 100% coverage? Even better, but it becomes a situations of is it really worth it? As for testing specific other products (such as Alpha Damp) and publishing that data, I don't think I will be able to do that while working for one of these companies. I'm all for someone else putting forth the effort to do this independently so I'm not the only one getting all of the flak. baaudio, the Peal and Seal product that I was requested to use in this test just happen to come as a 2" strip product. The results would be very close, if not exactly the same if it came on a 3' wide roll. Edited November 23, 2011 by Second Skin Rep Jon Quote Have a question about Second Skin? E-Mail me!
Quiet Posted November 23, 2011 Report Posted November 23, 2011 Well said, Jon. Some people won't believe it until they see proof. Some still won't believe it. And those people I will be louder than. Quote 2007 Pacifica Rebuild. Less quiet. Still not loud.
michigancapri92 Posted November 23, 2011 Report Posted November 23, 2011 (edited) can you show 100% coverage of cdl to show 100% PnS vs 100% CDL edit: not reading 3rd page fail >.< Edited November 23, 2011 by michigancapri92 Quote Teamcapri.comThe TeamCapri 1992 Mercury Capri XR22012 FORD EDGE SQ BUILDOld build logMy FeedBack1992 Mercury capri XR2 Hyper LED
MrSkippyJ Posted November 23, 2011 Report Posted November 23, 2011 You missed the entire mark on this one. Your saying that means you missed the point of my post, and so did jon as it seems. oh well, ill carry on misunderstood and y'all carry on selling stuff that doesn't do a bit of good for half the target audience of this forum. Note the gfaphs had huge spikes down low, where most of us want deadening to begin with. What do you mean spikes down low? Quote F150: Stock 2019 Harley Road Glide: Amp: TM400Xad - 4 channel 400 watt Processor: DSR1 Fairing (Front) 6.5s -MMats PA601cx Lid (Rear) 6x9s - TMS69
michigancapri92 Posted November 23, 2011 Report Posted November 23, 2011 You missed the entire mark on this one. Your saying that means you missed the point of my post, and so did jon as it seems. oh well, ill carry on misunderstood and y'all carry on selling stuff that doesn't do a bit of good for half the target audience of this forum. Note the gfaphs had huge spikes down low, where most of us want deadening to begin with. this test showed the results of 100% coverage vs 25% coverage ... obviously for those who are in the extreme situations they will use ACTUAL deadner AND do 100% coverage on a roof for example and possibly 2 layers or have the layers overlap a bit which im sure will give MUCH better results over the 25% coverage that was shown !!!!!!!! great test jon Quote Teamcapri.comThe TeamCapri 1992 Mercury Capri XR22012 FORD EDGE SQ BUILDOld build logMy FeedBack1992 Mercury capri XR2 Hyper LED
Second Skin Rep Jon Posted November 23, 2011 Author Report Posted November 23, 2011 oh well, ill carry on misunderstood and y'all carry on selling stuff that doesn't do a bit of good for half the target audience of this forum. Note the gfaphs had huge spikes down low, where most of us want deadening to begin with. What do you mean spikes down low? I don't know... As the graph moves horizontally, that is the time frame, starting at 0 and going all the way to 120 seconds. The vertical peaks is the amplitude of the vibration, higher the peak, the more it vibrated/registered. And I appreciate all the feedback, be it good or bad. Really I do appreciate it guys. Quote Have a question about Second Skin? E-Mail me!
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.